UAS groups of the United States military


The U.S. Department of Defense classifies unmanned aerial systems into "Groups" according to their size and capability, a joint system that replaced the service branches' separate categorization schemes in 2011.
The "Group" system has five categories, whose capabilities increase with the number.
GroupMaximum weight
Nominal operating
altitude
Speed Examples
10–20< 1,200 AGL100RQ-11 Raven, WASP, Puma
221–55< 3,500 AGL< 250ScanEagle, Flexrotor, SIC5, PDW C100
3< 1,320< FL 180< 250Shield AI V-BAT, RQ-7B Shadow, RQ-21 Blackjack, Navmar RQ-23 Tigershark, Arcturus-UAV Jump 20, Arcturus T-20, SIC25, Resolute ISR Resolute Eagle, Vanilla Unmanned
4> 1,320< FL 180AnyMQ-8B Fire Scout, MQ-1A/B Predator, MQ-1C Gray Eagle
5> 1,320> FL 180AnyMQ-9 Reaper, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-4C Triton, Skydweller Aero

Earlier categorization schemes

Tier systems

From about 2004 to 2011, U.S. military planners used various "Tier systems" to designate the various elements in an overall plan for integrated operations. The Tiers do not refer to specific models of aircraft, but rather roles the aircraft would fill. The U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Army each have their own tier system.

U.S. Air Force tiers

U.S. Marine Corps tiers

Role currently filled by the AAI RQ-7 Shadow, although USMC planners do not view this aircraft as meeting future Tier III requirements.

U.S. Army tiers

Future Combat Systems (Cancelled)

UAS were grouped in four classes under the Future Combat Systems, which was the Army's principal modernization program from 2003 to early 2009:
  • Class I: For small units. Role to be filled by all new UAV with some similarity to Micro Air Vehicle.
  • Class II: For companies.
  • Class III: For battalions.
  • Class IV: For brigades. Role to be filled by the RQ-8A/B / MQ-8B Fire Scout.