Acol
Acol is the bridge bidding system that, according to The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge, is "standard in British tournament play and widely used in other parts of the world". It is a natural system using four-card majors and, most commonly, a weak no trump.
Origins
Acol is named after the Acol Bridge Club in London NW6, where it originated in the early 1930s. The club was founded on Acol Road, named after Acol, Kent. According to Terence Reese, the system's main devisers were Maurice Harrison-Gray, Jack Marx and S. J. "Skid" Simon. Marx wrote in the Contract Bridge Journal of December 1952, that "...the Acol system was pieced together by Skid Simon and myself the best part of 20 years ago." In another account, Marx and Simon...The first book on the system was written by Ben Cohen and Terence Reese. Skid Simon explained the principles that lay behind the system, and the system was further popularised in Britain by Iain Macleod. The Acol system is continually evolving but the underlying principle is to keep the bidding as natural as possible. It is common in the British Commonwealth but rarely played in North America.
Ely Culbertson and his partner Teddy Lightner had visited the Acol Bridge Club in 1934, after which members S.J. Simon and Jack Marx became interested in bridge bidding theory. Simon and Marx soon afterwards began a discussion that eventually led to the first version of the Acol system.
Bidding system structure
As a bidding system, Acol has the following characteristics:- It is a natural system: most opening bids, responses and rebids are made with at least four cards in the suit bid, and most no trump bids are made with balanced hands.
- It is a four-card major system: only four-card suits are required to open 1 or 1, unlike Standard American and many other systems where five-card suits are typically required.
- It is an approach forcing system: as in most modern bidding systems, a new suit in response to a suit opening is forcing, unlike some older systems such as Vienna, which require responder to jump in order to force opener to bid again.
- It makes extensive use of limit bids: limit bids describe the hand so closely, in terms of high card points and shape, that the one who makes the limit bid is expected to pass on the next round, unless partner makes a forcing bid.
- Understanding and correct use of limit bids and forcing bids is fundamental to applying the system: all no trump bids below the level of 4NT are limit bids, as are all suit bids that merely repeat a suit already bid by the partnership; changes of suit may be forcing or not depending on the approach bids.
- The level of the 1NT opening bid influences other bids: the normal choice is between a "weak no trump" and a "strong no trump", but normally in Acol a weak NT is used throughout, unlike Standard American which uses a strong NT. In earlier forms of Acol, a "variable no trump" was common; 12–14 non-vulnerable and 16–18 vulnerable.
- It is the only "fully natural" bidding system which does not require a "short club" or "prepared" club or diamond bid with less than four cards. All opening bids at the one-level promise at least four cards in the bid suit.
Variants
- Acol: unregulated Acol, from the simple to the complex, remains in common use throughout the UK. At any one time the version in most common use will be known as "Standard Acol" although this term will mean different things to different players and is sometimes confused with Standard English Acol.
- Standard English Acol or Bridge for All Acol. Developed by the English Bridge Union in 1996, and designed to facilitate the learning of bridge and to provide standardised guidance to novices, intermediate players and their teachers. This variant uses the weak 1NT opening and strong two opening bids. Simple conventions such as Stayman, Blackwood and Transfers are included at various stages in the learning process. It has been widely promulgated by the EBU and by EBUTA in particular, but the exact form is used mainly by those who have learned their bridge recently and those who taught them.
- Modern Acol: a broad term for modern systems based on standard Acol but adding some additional conventions, particularly transfers and alternative ways of playing opening two-bids, as described below. Varies between partnerships, but typically includes two-suited overcalls, cue bids, checkback Stayman, Jacoby 2NT and Roman Key Card Blackwood.
- Benjaminised Acol: recognising that strong two opening bids occur rarely, the 2 and 2 openings are used as weak two bids to show weak hands containing long suits. Very strong hands are shown by an opening bid of 2 which forces a 2 response allowing suits to be shown. The strongest hands are shown by an opening bid of 2.
- Reverse Benji: identical to Benji except that the 2 and 2 bids are switched in meaning. A 2 opening bid is now the strongest bid, as in basic Acol.
- Modern Acol with Three Weak Twos: uses the Standard American pattern where 2 is the only strong bid and 2, as well as 2 and 2, is a weak two bid. Proponents consider that a Benji 2 bid on 23+ or a game forcing hand is too infrequent to use up a whole opening bid. A weak two in diamonds is much more common. However, some definition may be lost on strong hands aiming for slam. The English Bridge Union's recommended teaching methods have changed from strong twos to three weak twos in recent years.
- Acol with Multi 2: this variant of Acol makes use of the Multi 2 diamonds convention, where 2 shows a variety of hands including weak two bids in hearts and spades. The 2 bid is used as in standard Acol. Various uses are made of the 2 and 2 bids, with traditional strong twos or Lucas twos being some popular methods.
- For options with a weak NT and five card majors or five card spades, see Alternatives.
Standard Acol
Opening bids
Opening bids promise at least 12 high card points, or the equivalent in HCP and shape, unless preempting. Apart from NT, opening bids guarantee the ability to make a rebid over any forcing response from partner. There are six special opening bids which are quite closely defined, and one wide-ranging opening bid:- Special opening bids:
- * 1NT — Shows a balanced hand. Subject to partnership agreement, it may be either weak, strong or variable. Limit bid. The weak NT is by far the most common practice among UK club and social players.
- * 2 — Conventional game-forcing bid, promising game-going values and at least 5 quick tricks. Game forcing unless responder replies 2 and opener rebids 2NT.
- * 2 of any other suit — Strong two bid which shows a strong hand with at least eight playing tricks and a 6-card suit. Forcing for one round. Many players nowadays use weak twos or other alternatives - see Variants.
- * 2NT — Shows a balanced hand with 20–22 HCP. Limit bid.
- * 3 of a suit — Preemptive, normally seven or more cards in the suit bid, weak hand. Not forcing. 4 of a suit bids are similar but typically have at least an 8 card suit.
- * 3NT — Preemptive, shows a long solid minor suit and is called the Gambling 3NT
- Wide-ranging opening bid :
- * 1 of a suit — Promises a minimum of 12 HCP and a 4-card suit, 11 HCP and a 5-card suit, or 10 HCP and a 6-card suit. Not forcing.
Normally, opener bids their longest suit first, or the higher-ranking of two 5 card suits. With two 4-card suits opinions differ, especially if the two suits are a minor and a major in a balanced hand outside the 1NT opening range. There are pros and cons for opening with the minor or major suit first, and it is a partnership choice. Opening the minor first makes the system more similar to five-card majors.
Responses and further bidding
Most of the following sections assume unopposed bidding. If opponents overcall or double, this is noted separately in the Competitive Bidding section.Responses to 1 of a suit
- Pass — less than 6 HCP
- 2 of opener's suit — at least four-card support and 6–9 HCP. Limit bid.
- 3 of opener's suit — at least four-card support and 10–12 HCP. Invites game if opener has requisite strength. Limit bid.
- 4 of opener's suit — at least five-card support for opener's major and 6–10 HCP, this is preemptive and to play.
- 1NT — 6–9 HCP, denies ability to bid at 2 level. Not necessarily balanced. Limit bid.
- 2NT — balanced, 10–12 HCP. Limit bid.
- 3NT — balanced, 13–15 HCP. Limit bid.
- 1 of a new suit — promises at least four cards in the suit bid, 6 HCP upwards. Forcing for one round.
- 2 of a new suit — normally 5-card suit, at least a good 8 or 9 HCP. Forcing for one round
- Jump in a new suit — 5-card suit, at least 16 HCP, Game force.
Note 2: when supporting opener's suit with an 8-card fit or better, HCP ranges can be adjusted downwards slightly to allow for shortages
''Note 3: with at least four-card support for opener's major and 13+ HCP, bid a new suit and then jump to 4 of opener's suit on the next round, a delayed game raise. Alternatively, by partnership agreement, the Jacoby 2NT or an alternative method may be used.''