Banana Wars


The Banana Wars were a series of conflicts that consisted of military occupation, police action, and intervention by the United States in Central America and the Caribbean between the end of the Spanish–American War in 1898 and the inception of the Good Neighbor policy in 1934. The military interventions were primarily carried out by the United States Marine Corps, which developed a manual, the Small Wars Manual, based on their experiences. On occasion, the United States Navy provided gunfire support, and the United States Army also deployed troops.
With the Treaty of Paris signed in 1898, control of Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines fell to the United States. The United States conducted military interventions in Cuba, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. These conflicts ended when the US withdrew from Haiti in 1934 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
The term "banana wars" was popularized in 1983 by writer Lester D. Langley. Langley wrote several books on Latin American history and American intervention, including: The United States and the Caribbean, 1900–1970 and The Banana Wars: An Inner History of American Empire, 1900–1934. His work regarding the Banana Wars encompasses the entire United States tropical empire, which overtook the Western Hemisphere, spanning both Roosevelt presidencies. The term was popularized through this writing and portrayed the United States as a police force sent to reconcile warring tropical countries, lawless societies, and corrupt politicians, essentially establishing US reign over tropical trade.

Origins

Most prominently, the US was advancing economic, political, and military interests in order to maintain its sphere of influence and to secure the Panama Canal. The US had recently built the Panama Canal in order to promote global trade and to project its naval power. US companies, such as the United Fruit Company and Standard Fruit Company, also had financial stakes in the production of bananas, tobacco, sugarcane, and other commodities throughout the Caribbean, Central America, and northern South America.

Economic origins

The US justified its interventions in Latin America by stating they were necessary actions to protect its economic interest. The Panama Canal was used as a major justification of these interventions which America deemed essential for its trade and security over the Northern Hemisphere. With the 1901 Hay–Pauncefote Treaty, granting the US control to build the Panama Canal, the US felt the need to protect its economic goals and strategic objectives in the region which would later set the stage for the Banana Wars.
With financial stakes in many crops, the US also felt compelled to protect these companies producing these goods. Major food companies like UFC, which was the major exporter of bananas to the US, needed the military's help in protecting its large plantations and railroads from potential threats. With the US backing these companies, it allowed them to hold a large influence over the local governments. With an economic foothold in Latin America, the US was able to assert control over the region and ensure its interests came first.
Nicaragua was the main center of unrest against US companies' interest. Two main figures involved were Guatemala's ruler Manuel Estrada Cabrera, who ruthlessly modernized the economy with Indian slave labor, and Nicaragua's Liberal ruler, Jose Santos Zelaya. Both were forceful autocratic leaders and most importantly were mortal enemies. Cabrera managed to convince the US representatives in Latin America that he was an enlightened progressive trying to bring Guatemala into the modern age like America. Zelaya was against picking favorites with other countries outside of Latin America; Zelaya would preach about how the Americans should not involve themselves with Latin American business and stick to their own country. Therefore, American opinion of Zelaya was much lower than that of Manuel.
The Americans in Latin America did not like how Zelaya was involved in the economy of Latin America as well as his way of meddling in other countries' affairs to get what he felt was best. Zelaya's distaste of the Americans was exacerbated when the canal was built in Panama rather than Nicaragua.

Combat history

Interventions

Other Latin American nations were influenced or dominated by American economic policies and/or commercial interests to the point of coercion. Theodore Roosevelt declared the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine in 1904, asserting the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of states in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts. From 1909 to 1913, Taft and Secretary of State Philander C. Knox asserted a more "peaceful and economic" Dollar diplomacy foreign policy, although that too was backed by force, as in Nicaragua.

American Fruit Companies

The first decades of the history of Honduras are marked by instability in terms of politics and economy. Indeed, three armed conflicts occurred between independence and the rise to power of the Carias government. This instability was partly caused by American involvement in the country. One of the first companies that concluded an agreement with the Honduran government was the Vaccaro Brothers Company. The Cuyamel Fruit Company then followed their lead. UFC also contracted with the government through its subsidiaries, Tela Railroad Company and Truxillo Rail Road Company. Contracts between the Honduran government and the American companies most often involved exclusive rights to a piece of land in exchange for building railroads in Honduras.
However, banana producers in Central America "were scourged by Panama disease, a soil-borne fungus...that decimated production over large regions". Typically, companies would abandon the decimated plantations and destroy the railroads and other utilities that they had used along with the plantation, so the exchange of services between the government and the companies was not always respected.
The ultimate goal of the contracts for the companies was control of the banana trade from production to distribution. The companies would finance guerrilla fighters, presidential campaigns and governments. According to Rivera and Carranza, the indirect participation of American companies in the country's armed conflicts worsened the situation. The presence of more dangerous and modern weapons allowed more dangerous warfare among the factions.
In British Honduras, the situation was significantly different. Although UFC was the sole exporter of bananas there, and the company attempted to manipulate the local government, the country did not suffer the instability and armed conflicts that its neighbors experienced.