Anti-Japan Tribalism


Anti-Japan Tribalism: The Root of the Korean Crisis is a book written by Lee Young-hoon,,, Kim Yong-sam,, and. It was published by Miraesa on July 10, 2019. The Japanese version, published on November 14, 2019, is subtitled The Root of Japan-South Korea Crisis.
The book is based on a series of lectures delivered on the web-based, of which Lee is the host. The Japanese version was published by Bungeishunjū Ltd. in November 2019 and immediately became a bestseller. The book also became a bestseller in South Korea, topping the sales charts for seven consecutive weeks at 13 branches of one of the country's largest booksellers. The book became a bestseller in South Korea with 130,000 copies sold. Bungeishunjū announced it had sold 200,000 copies within a week. A translated English version of the book was published in March 2024.
The book has been criticized by South Korean historians for its historical distortions as well as its political bias, as many of its authors were associated with the New Right (South Korea).

Content

Described as "anti-Japan tribalism," the book posits that there is a shamanistic mentality in a small minority of South Korean people who regard Japan as their primary enemy. Such a mentality, the authors argue, gave rise to some anti-Japan arguments among some South Koreans. In the book’s prologue titled "A Country of Lies," Lee Young-hoon speaks critically of the people who lie, the politics which lie, the scholarship of lies, and the trials of lies. According to this book, the lies are particularly noticeable in some instances of the South Korea's national history. Lee and the co-authors thus argue a minority of people in their country have created a small number of forged historical accounts.

Table of contents

The table of contents of this book, in Japanese edition, is as following:
;Preface to the Japanese Edition
;Preface
;Prologue: A Nation of Lies
;Part 1: Memory of Tribalism
;Part 2: Symbol and Fantasy of Tribalism
;Part 3: Comfort Women, a Bastion of Tribalism
;Epilogue: Retribution of the Anti-Japan Tribalism
;'''Commentary: A Patriotism Interrogated by "Anti-Japan Tribalism"'''

Controversy

Former Minister of Justice Cho Kuk criticized it for downplaying Imperial Japan’s wartime actions, including forced labor. In response, author Lee Young-hoon dismissed Cho’s remarks as misrepresentations of the book’s arguments.
Professors from various South Korean universities co-authored a comprehensive critique on the book, titled Japanese Imperialist Tribalism and published in October 2019. Academics and experts lambasted “Anti-Japan Tribalism,” including the book's claims that forced labor conscription “did not occur” and that comfort women were “not sexual slaves” to the Japanese military. Critics also noted that the claims in “Anti-Japan Tribalism” concerning the Japanese military comfort women system have already been academically dismissed.
Kang Sung-hyun, a research professor at the Sungkonghoe University Institute for East Asian Studies, said, “Current research findings have clearly established that while the Japanese military comfort women system may have been modeled on a colonial licensed prostitution system, it transformed into a more oppressive model; that there was widespread forced mobilization against the individual’s will, and the licensed prostitution system was illegal under both Japanese criminal law and international law before the war; that the lives of comfort women were equivalent to sexual slavery; and that not only colonial licensed prostitution systems but also Japan’s own licensed prostitution system should viewed from a perspective of sexual enslavement.”
Critics also noted that “Most of the writers are members of the New Right, and the alternative, Kyohak, and state-designated historical textbooks they spearheaded were discontinued for their whitewashing of collaboration and dictatorship and their inadequate content...Their aim, like that of the Japanese far-right group Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform, is to increase popular influence in order to rally conservatives and strengthen their own position.”
Yuji Hosaka published a critique on the book in April 2020, arguing that the authors are "New Pro-Japanese Collaborators".