All Over the Town
All Over the Town is a 1949 British comedy film directed by Derek N. Twist and starring Norman Wooland, Sarah Churchill and Cyril Cusack. It was written by Michael Gordon and Twist based on the 1947 novel by R. F. Delderfield.
Plot
After serving in the RAF during the Second World War, Nat Hearn returns to his pre-war job as a reporter on the Tormouth Clarion. He meets and is attracted to Sally Thorpe, who had replaced him when he enlisted and has been given notice now that he has returned. He arranges for her to be kept on, and they spend time together and become engaged to be married.Later, Nat becomes a co-owner and editor of the paper, but the other co-owner disagrees with Nat's new editorial policy, which often involves upsetting people who provide the paper with much of its advertising revenue. The co-owner arranges for most of the staff to take holiday time off simultaneously to prevent Nat's opposition to Tormouth Council's proposed redevelopment scheme, from which some councillors plan to profit personally. Despite this, at a public meeting called by the council Nat and his small band of supporters manage to convince the locals to support Nat in the dispute.
Cast
- Norman Wooland as Nat Hearn
- Sarah Churchill as Sally Thorpe
- Cyril Cusack as Gerald Vane
- Ronald Adam as Sam Vane
- Bryan Forbes as Trumble
- James Hayter as Baines
- Fabia Drake as Miss Gelding
- John Salew as Sleek
- Stanley Baker as Barnes
- Edward Rigby as Grimmett
- Patrick Doonan as Burton
- Eleanor Summerfield as Beryl Hopper
- Trefor Jones as Tenor
- Sandra Dorne as Marlene
- Hubert Leslie as Skinner
- Henry Edwards as Major Martindale
- Frederick Leister as Wainer
- Patrick Macnee as Mr Vince
- Anthony Oliver as PC Butt
- Erik Chitty as Frobisher
- Walter Horsbrugh as Mr Thornton
- Lydia Bilbrook as Mrs Vane
Production
Reception
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "The acting for the most part is good, but not outstanding. The satirical comedy and humour are good. Direction and production are adequate and the film has an exciting climax and satisfying ending."The [New York Times] described it as a "slow, dogmatic little picture" with a "dog-eared" plot.
According to the review in The Times, the film's plot was unoriginal, executed "without inspiration or any originality of thought".