Actio libera in causa
Actio libera in causa is a law principle in a typical Western law system. The doctrine means that even if the person was not free to choose the course of action while performing an offence, he can still be held responsible for it if he voluntarily created a condition for the offending action. A typical example is self-defense: in Anglo-American jurisdictions lethal action is justified under certain circumstances while protecting oneself, others, or property. However, this defense is not available, for example, to a person who started the fight, thus creating a "cause" for killing in self-defense at a later time. Most frequently a.l.i.c. is mentioned with regard to voluntary intoxication: if a person gets drunk, she will not be able use her state of inebriation to claim that, for example, her act of negligence was an accident.
History
The doctrine was created during the Age of Enlightenment by philosophers and law scholars who distinguished between:- , an "act free by itself", a situation when the person was able to choose to act or not to act;
- , an "act not free by itself and its cause also not free", a situation where the person was involuntary forced into circumstances where he had no choice but to act;
- , an "act not free by itself but its cause was free", a situation where the person also had no choice but to act, but prior to that he had voluntarily chosen the conditions that forced the subsequent act. This is the situation that led to the formation of the a.l.i.c. doctrine.