List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 7


This is a list of cases reported in volume 7 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1805 and 1806.

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions.

William Cranch

Starting with the 5th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was William Cranch. Cranch was Reporter of Decisions from 1801 to 1815, covering volumes 5 through 13 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 9 of his Cranch's Reports. As such, the complete citation to, for example, Peyton v. Brooke is 7 U.S. 92.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 7 U.S. (3 Cranch)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in 7 U.S. were decided, the Court comprised these six justices:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
John MarshallChief JusticeVirginiaOliver Ellsworth


July 6, 1835
William Cushing
Associate JusticeMassachusettsoriginal seat established


September 13, 1810
William Paterson
Associate JusticeNew JerseyThomas Johnson


September 8, 1806
Samuel Chase
Associate JusticeMarylandJohn Blair, Jr.


June 19, 1811
Bushrod Washington
Associate JusticeVirginiaJames Wilson



November 26, 1829
William Johnson
Associate JusticeSouth CarolinaAlfred Moore


August 4, 1834

Notable cases in 7 U.S. (3 Cranch)

''United States v. More''

In United States v. More, , the Court held it had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from criminal cases in the circuit courts by writs of error. Relying on the Exceptions Clause, the Supreme Court held that Congress's enumerated grants of appellate jurisdiction to the Court operated as an exercise of Congress's power to eliminate all other forms of appellate jurisdiction.
More ensured that the Court's criminal jurisprudence would be limited to writs of error from the state courts, habeas petitions, and writs of error from habeas petitions in the circuit courts, and certificates of division and mandamus from the circuit courts. Congress did not grant the Court jurisdiction to hear writs of error from the circuit courts in criminal cases until 1889, for capital crimes, and 1891, for other "infamous" crimes. The Judicial Code of 1911 abolished the circuit courts, transferred the trial of crimes to the district courts, and extended the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction to all crimes. But, these statutory grants were construed not to permit writs of error filed by the prosecution, as in More.

''Strawbridge v. Curtiss''

In Strawbridge v. Curtiss, the Supreme Court first addressed the question of complete diversity for diversity jurisdiction. In a brief opinion the Court held that for federal diversity jurisdiction, under section 11 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, no party on one side of a suit may be a citizen of the same state as any party on the other side. Therefore, when there are joint plaintiffs or defendants, jurisdiction must be established as to each individual party. That requirement remains acceptable in law as a matter of statutory interpretation, not constitutional command.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower courtDisposition
Huidekoper's Lessee v. DouglassMarshallJohnsonnoneC.C.D. Pa.certification
United States v. HooeMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.multiple
Peyton v. BrookeMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Lambert's Lessee v. PaineJohnsonWashington, Paterson, CushingnoneC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Hodgson v. ButtsMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
United States v. MoreMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.dismissed
Faw v. Roberdeau's ExecutorMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Ray v. LawMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.appeal allowed
Levy v. GadsbyMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Marine Insurance Company v. WilsonWashingtonPatersonnoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Wilson v. Codman's ExecutorMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Hallet v. JenksMarshallnonenoneN.Y.affirmed
Milligan v. MilledgeMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Georgiareversed
Cooke v. Graham's AdministratorMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Dobynes v. United Statesper curiamnonenoneD. Ky.reversed
Hannay v. EveMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Ga.affirmed
Silsby v. YoungMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Ga.reversed
Montalet v. MurrayMarshallnonenonenot indicateddismissed
Strawbridge v. CurtissMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Gordon v. CaldcleughMarshallnonenoneS.C. Ct. Eq.dismissed
McFerran v. TaylorMarshallnonenoneD. Ky.reversed
Wilson v. SpeedMarshallnonenoneD. Ky.reversed
Buddicum v. KirkMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Douglass v. McAllisterMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Simms v. SlacumMarshallnonePatersonC.C.D.C.reversed
Harris v. JohnstonMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Dixon's Executors v. Ramsay's ExecutorsMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Scott v. LondonMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Wise v. WithersMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
United States v. GrundyMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Baltimoreaffirmed
Marine Insurance Company v. TuckerJohnsonWashington, Cushing, PatersonnoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
United States v. HethJohnsonWashington, Paterson, CushingnoneC.C.D. Va.certification
Manella, Pujals and Company v. BarryMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Md.affirmed
Ex parte BurfordMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.prisoner discharged
Hopkirk v. Bellper curiamnonenoneC.C.D. Va.certification
Maley v. ShattuckMarshallnonenoneC.C.D. Pa.reversed
Lawrason v. MasonMarshallnonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Knox v. SummersWashingtonnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Sands v. KnoxMarshallnonenoneN.Y.affirmed
Randolph v. WarePatersonCushingnoneC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Winchester v. Jacksonper curiamnonenonenot indicateddismissed
Field v. Miltonper curiamnonenonenot indicatedcertiorari granted