7 Days (Irish TV programme)
7 Days was an Irish current affairs television programme presented by Brian Farrell, Brian Cleeve, and John O'Donoghue which was broadcast on RTÉ One from 1966 until 1976.
History
Background
Seven Days was created by RTÉ One as a replacement for the existing programme Sixty Six. It was developed at a time when the station was expanding its current affairs programming. Innovations included having TDs and senators from the political parties giving their opinions on Dáil proceedings instead of hearing from the political correspondents of the daily newspapers. Broadcast live on Monday evenings between 8:45pm and 9:15pm, it quickly became RTÉ's flagship current affairs programme. Seven Days was broadcast for the first time on 26 September 1966.Presenters
John O'Donoghue, Brian Cleeve and Brian Farrell were the first presenters of the programme. The three had earlier worked on Telefís Éireann's first current affairs programme Broadsheet in the early 1960s.Rebranding
In 1967 the programme was merged with another current affairs programme, Division, and rebranded as 7 Days. As a result of this amalgamation the team of presenters was expanded to include David Thornley, Ted Nealon, Bill O'Herlihy and Paddy Gallagher.In 1968, it was announced that the current affairs programme, which often tackled subjects of public controversy in a forthright manner, was to be moved to the RTÉ News division. This led to a threatened strike and ultimately to the resignation of several of the programme's presenters.
7 Days was the first home-produced programme to be shown in colour by RTÉ, although colour transmissions of imports predated it.
Tribunal of Inquiry
In December 1969 the Oireachtas voted to establish a tribunal of inquiry regarding a 7 Days piece on money-lenders. The programme, which was filmed in part with hidden cameras and microphones, claimed that illegal moneylending was causing misery and that the State was not responding to it. The tribunal's terms of reference were:- That the allegation of the use of strong-arm methods by unlicensed moneylenders was unfounded
- That the numbers and scale of illegal moneylenders operating in the country were far less than those suggested by the programme
- That the statements made in the programme purporting to be confessions by moneylenders as to strong-arm debt recovery tactics were entirely valueless