List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 52


This is a list of cases reported in volume 52 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1850 and 1851.

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions.

Benjamin Chew Howard

Starting with the 42nd volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Benjamin Chew Howard. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his Howard's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, United States v. City of Philadelphia is 52 U.S. 609.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 52 U.S. (11 How.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article Three of [the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1] of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in 52 U.S. were decided the Court comprised these nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. TaneyChief [Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]MarylandJohn Marshall


October 12, 1864
John McLeanAssociate JusticeOhioRobert Trimble


April 4, 1861
James Moore WayneAssociate JusticeGeorgiaWilliam Johnson


July 5, 1867
John CatronAssociate JusticeTennesseenewly created seat


May 30, 1865
John McKinleyAssociate JusticeAlabamanewly created seat


July 19, 1852
Peter Vivian DanielAssociate JusticeVirginiaPhilip P. Barbour


May 31, 1860
Samuel NelsonAssociate JusticeNew YorkSmith Thompson


November 28, 1872
Levi WoodburyAssociate JusticeNew HampshireJoseph Story


September 4, 1851
Robert Cooper GrierAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaHenry Baldwin


January 31, 1870

Notable case in 52 U.S. (11 How.)

''Hotchkiss v. Greenwood''

Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, , is a Supreme Court decision credited with introducing into United States patent law the concept of Non-obviousness in [United States patent law|non-obviousness] as a patentability requirement, as well as stating the applicable legal standard for determining its presence or absence in a claimed invention.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower courtDisposition of case
Gratz's Ex'rs v. CohenWoodburynonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.reversed
United States v. GiraultNelsonnonenoneN.D. Miss.dismissed
Oakey v. BennettMcLeannonenoneD. Tex.affirmed
United States v. GuillemTaneynonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
United States v. BoisdoreCatronnoneMcLean, WayneS.D. Miss.reversed
Blanc v. LafayetteWaynenonenoneLa.affirmed
Lecompte v. United StatesDanielnonenoneD. La.affirmed
McCoy v. RhodesCatronnonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
McGill v. ArmourMcLeannonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
United States v. MorganWoodburynonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
Gruner v. United StatesTaneynonenoneD. Tex.dismissed
D'Arcy v. KetchumCatronnonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
Hortsman v. HenshawTaneynonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
League v. de YoungGriernonenoneTex.affirmed
Bevins ex rel. Earle v. Ramseyper curiamnonenoneC.C.D.E. Tenn.dismissed
Brooks v. NorrisTaneynonenoneLa.dismissed
Warner v. MartinWaynenonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.affirmed
Cotton v. United StatesGriernonenoneN.D. Fla.affirmed
Stockton v. FordNelsonnonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodNelsonnoneWoodburyC.C.D. Ohioaffirmed
Reeside v. WalkerWoodburynonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Florida v. Georgiaper curiamnonenoneoriginalsubpoena issued
Phillips v. Prestonper curiamnonenoneC.C.E.D. La.certification
Hogan v. Ross ex rel. PattersonTaneynonenoneN.D. Miss.supersedeas denied
Van Rensselaer v. KearneyNelsonnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Weatherhead's Lessee v. BaskervilleWaynenonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.reversed
Parks v. RossGriernonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Fowler v. MerrillWoodburynonenoneC.C.D. Ark.affirmed
Clements v. BerryMcLeannoneCatronTenn.reversed
Moore v. BrownWaynenoneTaney, CatronC.C.D. Ill.certification
Webster v. ReidMcLeannonenoneIowareversed
van Buren v. DiggesDanielnonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Conrad v. GriffeyWoodburynonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
Randon v. TobyGriernonenoneD. Tex.affirmed
Spear v. PlaceWoodburynonenoneD. Tex.dismissed
Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & B.B. Co.per curiamnonenoneoriginalcontinued
Gill v. Oliver's Ex'rsGrierWoodburyTaneyMd.dismissed
United States v. HughesCatronnonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
United States v. Power's HeirsCatronnonenoneS.D. Miss.reversed
Larman v. Tisdale's HeirsTaneynonenonenot indicateddismissal denied
Hogg v. EmersonWoodburynoneCatronC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
United States v. City of PhiladelphiaCatronnoneMcLeanD. La.reversed
United States v. TurnerTaneynonenoneD. La.reversed
Bennett v. ButterworthTaneynonenoneD. Tex.reversed