4.2 cm Pak 41
The 4.2 cm Pak 41 was a light anti-tank gun issued to German airborne units in World War II. This gun was externally similar to the 3.7 cm Pak 36, using a modified version of the latter's carriage, but used the squeeze bore principle. While it was nominally a gun, the actual caliber was at the breech and tapering down to at the muzzle. It saw limited use in the Italian and Eastern campaigns before shortages of strategic metals prevented the production of new guns and ammunition.
Background
The idea of tapering the barrel of a gun in order to increase muzzle velocity was worked on by several inventors before it was successfully applied by Hermann Gerlich, a German weapons designer, in the late 1920s. The German Army, using Gerlich's squeeze bore principle, managed to produce three different anti-tank guns based on it: the 2.8 cm schwere Panzerbuchse 41, the 4.2 cm Panzerjägerkanone 41, and the 7.[5 cm Pak 41|7.5 cm Panzerabwehrkanone 41].Description
The 4.2 cm Pak 41 was mounted on the 3.7 cm Pak 36 carriage. Externally, the two guns are very similar to each other, with the only obvious difference being the length of the barrel, which was about longer. Other changes include a spaced gun shield which was fitted over the original shield, and replacing of the carriage coil springs with a laminated torsion bar.Although nominally a caliber, the barrel actual caliber was at the breech end, tapering to at the muzzle, giving a muzzle velocity of. The breech was manually operated only. The gun carriage was very similar to the Pak 36.
Armour-piercing shells for the 4.2 cm Pak 41 had a tungsten carbide core which was encased in a mild steel body which was formed into skirts of a larger caliber. When traveling through the barrel, these skirts were squeezed down increasing gas pressure around the base area of the projectile and subsequently boosting muzzle velocity. While the squeeze bore design successfully increased penetration, it also made designing high-explosive projectiles much more difficult, and these were rarely used. Other drawbacks was the need for tungsten, which had to be imported, and excessive barrel wear, reducing their service life and making the production of guns uneconomical.