United States Reports, volume 3


This is a list of cases reported in volume 3 U.S. of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from 1794 to 1799. Case reports from other tribunals also appear in 3 U.S..

Alexander Dallas and ''Dallas Reports''

Not all of the cases reported in 3 U.S. are from the United States Supreme Court. Included are decisions from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania.
Alexander J. Dallas, a Philadelphia lawyer and later United States Secretary of the Treasury, had been in the business of reporting local law cases for newspapers and periodicals. When the US Supreme Court sat in Philadelphia from 1791 to 1800, he collected their cases as well, and later began compiling his case reports in a bound volume which he called Reports of cases ruled and adjudged in the courts of Pennsylvania, before and since the Revolution.
When the US Supreme Court along with the rest of the new federal government moved in 1791 from the former capital, New York City, to the nation's temporary capital in Philadelphia, Dallas was appointed the Supreme Court's first unofficial and unpaid Supreme Court Reporter. Dallas continued to collect and publish Pennsylvania and other decisions, adding federal Supreme Court cases to his reports. Dallas published four volumes of decisions during his tenure as Reporter, known as the Dallas Reports.
The Supreme Court moved to the new capital city of Washington D.C. in 1800. Dallas remained in Philadelphia; William Cranch then replaced him as Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Nominative Reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions. As such, volumes 1–4 of United States Reports correspond to volumes 1–4 of Dallas Reports. The dual citation form of, for example, Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee is 3 U.S. 305.

Courts in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

The cases reported in 3 U.S. come from the Supreme Court of the United States, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in 3 U.S. were decided, the Court comprised six of the following eleven justices at one time:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
John JayChief JusticeNew Yorkoriginal seat when the Court was established


June 29, 1795
John RutledgeChief JusticeSouth Carolinaoriginal seat when the Court was established


March 4, 1791
William CushingAssociate JusticeMassachusettsoriginal seat when the Court was established


September 13, 1810
James WilsonAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaoriginal seat when the Court was established


August 21, 1798
John BlairAssociate JusticeVirginiaoriginal seat when the Court was established


October 25, 1795
James IredellAssociate JusticeNorth Carolinaoriginal seat when the Court was established


October 20, 1799
Thomas JohnsonAssociate JusticeMarylandJohn Rutledge


January 16, 1793
William PatersonAssociate JusticeNew JerseyThomas Johnson


September 8, 1806
Samuel ChaseAssociate JusticeMarylandJohn Blair, Jr.


June 19, 1811
Oliver EllsworthChief JusticeConnecticutJohn Rutledge


December 15, 1800
Bushrod WashingtonAssociate JusticeVirginiaJames Wilson



November 26, 1829

Notable Cases in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

''Calder v. Bull''

In Calder v. Bull, , the Supreme Court decided four important points of constitutional law:
  • First, the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution applies to criminal laws that have at least one of four effects: creates a crime and penalty that before passage of the law which was not illegal; makes an existing crime of greater severity than it was when committed; inflicts a greater punishment to an existing crime than applied before the law; changes rules of evidence to make less, or different, evidence than the law required at the time of the crime to convict the offender.
  • Second, the Court lacked authority to nullify state laws that may violate that state's own constitution.
  • Third, no one should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to refrain from acts which the laws permit.
  • Fourth, a state legislative act does not violate of the ex post facto clause if there is nothing done by the parties that is affected by the state law.

    ''Georgia v. Brailsford''

In Georgia v. Brailsford, , is significant as the only reported jury trial held by the US Supreme Court. During the American Revolution, the state of Georgia passed a law that sequestered debts owed to British creditors. The Treaty of Paris, however, asserted the validity of debts held by creditors on both sides. The case was filed directly in the United States Supreme Court, rather than in a lower trial court, under the Supreme Court's constitutionally defined original jurisdiction.

''Hollingsworth v. Virginia''

In Hollingsworth v. Virginia, the Court held the President of the United States has no formal role in the process of amending the United States Constitution, and that the Eleventh Amendment was binding on cases already pending before its ratification.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

Cases of the Supreme Court of the United States

CasePage & yearOpinions of the CourtLower courtDisposition
Georgia v. BrailsfordJay originaljury verdict for defendants
Glass v. The Sloop BetseyJayD. Md.Reversed
United States v. HamiltonWilsonD. Pa.certification
Bingham v. Cabot seriatim: Paterson, Iredell, Wilson, CushingC.C.D. Mass.reversed
United States v. Lawrenceper curiamD.N.Y.mandamus denied
Penhallow v. Doane's AdministratorsCushingC.C.D.N.H.reversed
United States v. PetersRutledgeD. Pa.prohibition issued
Talbot v. Jansonseriatim: Paterson, IredellC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Hylton v. United Statesseriatim: Chase, Paterson, IredellC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Hills v. Rossper curiamC.C.D. Ga.continued
McDonough v. Danneryper curiamC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Ware v. Hyltonseriatim: Chase, Wilson, CushingC.C.D. Va.reversed
Geyer v. Michelper curiamC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
United States v. La VengeanceEllsworthC.C.D.N.Y.affirmed
Cotton v. Wallaceper curiamC.C.D. Ga.mandate granted
Hunter v. Fairfax's Deviseeper curiamnot indicatedcontinued
Arcambel v. Wisemanper curiamC.C.D.R.I.remittitur granted
Moodie v. The Ship Alfredper curiamnot indicatedaffirmed
Olney v. ArnoldEllsworthR.I. Super. Ct.affirmed
Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe AnneEllsworthC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Grayson v. VirginiaEllsworthoriginalsubpoena granted
Wiscart v. Dauchyper curiamC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Hills v. Rossseriatim: Ellsworth, Iredell, ChaseC.C.D. Ga.reversed
Del Col v. Arnoldper curiamC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Jennings v. The Brig Perseveranceseriatim: Paterson, ChaseC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Huger v. South Carolinaseriatim: Iredell, Chaseoriginalpetition granted
Clerke v. Harwoodper curiamMd.affirmed
Brown v. Van Braamseriatim: Wilson, Paterson, ChaseC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Fenemore v. United Statesseriatim: Chase, Iredell, Cushing, Ellsworth, PatersonC.C.D.N.J.affirmed
Brown v. BarryEllsworthC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Emory v. Grenoughper curiamC.C.D. Mass.dismissed
Hamilton v. Mooreper curiamC.C.D. Ga.dismissed
Hollingsworth v. Virginiaper curiam, and Chasenot indicateddismissed
Bingham v. Cabot per curiamC.C.D. Mass.dismissed
Jones v. Le Tombeper curiamoriginalrule made absolute
Calder v. Bullseriatim: Chase, Paterson, Iredell, CushingConn.affirmed
Wilson v. Danielseriatim: Ellsworth, Iredell, ChaseC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Dewhurst v. Coulthardper curiamC.C.D.N.Y.dismissed
Ex parte Hallowellper curiamoriginalHallowell admitted to bar of Court
Fowler v. Lindseyseriatim: Washington, Paterson, CushingC.C.D. Conn.rule discharged
Clarke v. RusselEllsworthC.C.D.R.I.reversed
Sims' Lessee v. Irvineseriatim: Ellsworth, IredellC.C.D. Pa.affirmed