List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 274


This is a list of cases reported in volume 274 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1927.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 274 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789, Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 274 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
William Howard TaftChief JusticeConnecticutEdward Douglass White


February 3, 1930
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.Associate JusticeMassachusettsHorace Gray


January 12, 1932
Willis Van DevanterAssociate JusticeWyomingEdward Douglass White


June 2, 1937
James Clark McReynoldsAssociate JusticeTennesseeHorace Harmon Lurton


January 31, 1941
Louis BrandeisAssociate JusticeMassachusettsJoseph Rucker Lamar


February 13, 1939
George SutherlandAssociate JusticeUtahJohn Hessin Clarke


January 17, 1938
Pierce ButlerAssociate JusticeMinnesotaWilliam R. Day


November 16, 1939
Edward Terry SanfordAssociate JusticeTennesseeMahlon Pitney


March 8, 1930
Harlan F. StoneAssociate JusticeNew YorkJoseph McKenna


July 2, 1941

Notable Cases in 274 U.S.

''Buck v. Bell''

In Buck v. Bell,, the Supreme Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Despite the changing attitudes in the coming decades regarding sterilization, the Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. It was widely believed to have been slightly weakened by Skinner v. Oklahoma 316 U.S. 535, which involved compulsory sterilization of male habitual criminals.

''Whitney v. California''

In Whitney v. California,, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a person who had engaged in speech that raised a threat to society. The question before the court was whether the 1919 Criminal Syndicalism Act of California violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. The Court unanimously upheld Whitney's conviction; holding that the state, in exercise of its police power, has the power to punish those who abuse their rights to freedom of speech "by utterances inimical to the public welfare, tending to incite crime, disturb the public peace, or endanger the foundations of organized government and threaten its overthrow." In other words, words with a "bad tendency" can be punished.

''United States v. Lee''

United States v. Lee, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/101118/united-states-v-lee 274 U.S. 559 the U.S. Coast Guard may seize, board, and search vessels beyond the U.S. territorial waters and the high seas 12 miles outward from the coast if probable cause exists to believe that the vessel and persons in it are violating U.S. revenue laws, and 2) the Coast Guard's use of [searchlights to view contents of a vessel on the high seas does not constitute a search and thus does not warrant Fourth Amendment protections; the use of a searchlight is comparable to the use of binoculars, and the courts have long held that use of binoculars by law enforcement is not prohibited by the Constitution.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 274 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
Fairmont Creamery Company v. MinnesotaMcReynoldsnonenoneMinn.reversed
Ohio Public Service Company v. Ohio ex rel. FritzMcReynoldsnonenoneOhioreversed
Hodgson v. Federal Oil and Development CompanyMcReynoldsnonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Hoffman v. Missouri ex rel. ForakerBrandeisnonenoneMo.affirmed
Lowe v. DicksonSutherlandnonenoneOkla.reversed
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesSutherlandnonenoneN.D. Tex.affirmed
Bedford Cut Stone Company v. Journeymen Stone Cutters' Association of North AmericaSutherlandSanford; StoneBrandeis7th Cir.reversed
Northern Railroad Company v. PageButlernonenone1st Cir.reversed
Southern Railroad Company v. KentuckyButlernoneBrandeisKy.reversed
McDonald v. MaxwellSanfordnonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
American National Company v. United StatesSanfordnonenoneW.D. Okla.reversed
United States ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Company v. United States Tariff CommissionStonenonenoneD.C. Cir.vacated
Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Company, Inc. v. YeldellStonenonenoneAla.affirmed
New York Dock Company v. Steamship PoznanStonenonenone2d Cir.reversed
Fidelity National Bank and Trust Company of Kansas City v. SwopeStonenonenone8th Cir.reversed
Morris v. DubyTaftnonenoneD. Or.affirmed
Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerTaftnoneMcReynoldsD.C. Cir.reversed
Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace CompanyTaftnoneMcReynoldsD.C. Cir.reversed
Kadow v. PaulTaftnonenoneWash.affirmed
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyTaftnonenoneN.D. Ohiotransfer to 6th Cir.
Road Improvement District No. 1 of Franklin County, Arkansas v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyVanDevanternonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Duignan v. United StatesStonenonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Buck v. BellHolmesnonenoneVa.affirmed
Burnrite Coal Briquette Company v. RiggsBrandeisnonenone3d Cir.affirmed
Liggett and Myers Tobacco Company v. United StatesButlernonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Kercheval v. United StatesButlernonenone8th Cir.reversed
United States v. Stone and Downer CompanyTaftnoneMcReynoldsCt. Cust. App.reversed
Zimmermann v. SutherlandHolmesnonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Westfall v. United StatesHolmesnonenone6th Cir.certification
United States v. SullivanHolmesnonenone4th Cir.reversed
United States v. AlfordHolmesnonenoneN.D. Fla.reversed
United States v. Sisal Sales CorporationMcReynoldsnonenoneS.D.N.Y.reversed
Deal v. United StatesMcReynoldsnonenone9th Cir.reversed
Hope Natural Gas Company v. HallMcReynoldsnonenoneW. Va.affirmed
Alston v. United StatesMcReynoldsnonenone8th Cir.affirmed
United States v. LudeyBrandeisnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company v. SpillerBrandeisnonenone8th Cir.multiple
Baltimore Steamship Company v. PhillipsSutherlandnonenone2d Cir.reversed
Zahn v. Board of Public Works of the City of Los AngelesSutherlandnonenoneCal.affirmed
Burns v. United StatesButlernoneBrandeisN.D. Cal.affirmed
Phelps v. United StatesButlernonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company v. Public Utilities Commission of IdahoButlernonenoneIdahoreversed
Hess v. PawloskiButlernonenoneMass. Super. Ct.affirmed
Whitney v. CaliforniaSanfordBrandeisnoneCal. Ct. App.affirmed
Fiske v. KansasSanfordnonenoneKan.reversed
Fort Smith Light and Traction Company v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 16 of Fort SmithStonenonenoneArk.affirmed
Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. DeckebachStonenonenoneOhioaffirmed
United States v. S.S. White Dental Manufacturing CompanyStonenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse CompanyStonenonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Posados v. City of ManilaTaftnonenonePhilaffirmed
Overland Motor Company v. Packard Motor CompanyTaftnonenone7th Cir.certification
Messel v. Foundation CompanyTaftnonenoneLa.reversed
Rhea v. SmithTaftnonenoneMo.reversed
Cline v. Frink Dairy CompanyTaftnonenoneD. Colo.multiple
United States v. Freights of Steamship Mount ShastaHolmesnoneMcReynoldsD. Mass.reversed
Empire Trust Company v. CahanHolmesnonenone2d Cir.reversed
Biddle v. PerovichHolmesnonenone8th Cir.certification
New York v. Illinois and Sanitary District of ChicagoVanDevanternonenoneoriginalmotion to strike granted
Power Manufacturing Company v. SaundersVanDevanternoneHolmesArk.reversed
Longest v. LangfordVanDevanternonenoneOkla.dismissed
Maul v. United StatesVanDevanterBrandeisnone2d Cir.affirmed
Nichols v. CoolidgeMcReynoldsnonenoneD. Mass.affirmed
Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco CompanyMcReynoldsnonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Joines v. PattersonMcReynoldsnonenoneOkla.reversed
Clark v. PoorBrandeisnonenoneS.D. Ohioaffirmed
United States v. LeeBrandeisnonenone1st Cir.reversed
Assigned Car CasesBrandeisnoneMcReynoldsE.D. Pa.reversed
Lawrence v. St. Louis–San Francisco Railway CompanyBrandeisnonenoneN.D. Okla.reversed
Arkansas Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyBrandeisnonenoneE.D. Ark.reversed
Gorieb v. FoxSutherlandnonenoneVa.affirmed
Merritt and Chapman Derrick and Wrecking Company v. United StatesButlernonenoneS.D.N.Y.affirmed
Stewart and Company v. RivaraButlernonenoneN.Y. Sup. Ct.affirmed
Federal Trade Commission v. Eastman Kodak CompanySanfordnoneStone2d Cir.affirmed
Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Company v. BrownStonenonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Independent Coal and Coke Company v. United StatesStonenonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Fox River Paper Company v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinStonenonenoneWis.affirmed
Weedin v. Chin BowTaftnonenone9th Cir.reversed
City of Vidalia v. McNeelyVanDevanternonenoneW.D. La.affirmed
Twist v. Prairie Oil and Gas CompanyBrandeisnonenone8th Cir.reversed
United States v. International Harvester CompanySanfordnonenoneD. Minn.affirmed