List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 200


This is a list of cases reported in volume 200 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1906.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 200 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 200 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite


July 4, 1910
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis


October 14, 1911
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews


March 28, 1910
Henry Billings BrownAssociate JusticeMichiganSamuel Freeman Miller


May 28, 1906
Edward Douglass WhiteAssociate JusticeLouisianaSamuel Blatchford


December 18, 1910
Rufus W. PeckhamAssociate JusticeNew YorkHowell Edmunds Jackson


October 24, 1909
Joseph McKennaAssociate JusticeCaliforniaStephen Johnson Field


January 5, 1925
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.Associate JusticeMassachusettsHorace Gray


January 12, 1932
William R. DayAssociate JusticeOhioGeorge Shiras Jr.


November 13, 1922

Notable Case in 200 U.S.

''United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.''

In United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., , the primary issue to the parties was ownership of 44 tracts of timberland, however, the case has become the standard reference to warn attorneys not to rely on the syllabus of a reported case as opposed to the text of the decision itself, since the syllabus is not written by the Supreme Court but by its Reporter of Decisions.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
United States ex rel. Drury v. LewisFullernonenoneC.C.W.D. Pa.affirmed
Albright v. New Mexico ex rel. SandovalFullernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. N.M.affirmed
Nutt v. KnutHarlannonenoneMiss.affirmed
Knoxville Water Company v. City of KnoxvilleHarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. Tenn.affirmed
Owensboro Waterworks Company v. City of OwensboroHarlannonenoneC.C.W.D. Ky.affirmed
Peoria Gas and Electric Company v. City of PeoriaBrewernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Guaranty Trust and Deposit Company v. FisherBrewernonenone4th Cir.affirmed
Howard v. PerrinBrewernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.affirmed
Kolze v. HoadleyBrownnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Campbell v. CaliforniaWhitenonenoneCal.affirmed
Herrick v. Boquillas Land and Cattle CompanyWhitenonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.affirmed
Serralles Succession v. EsbriPeckhamnonenoneP.R.reversed
Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula CountyPeckhamnonenoneC.C.D. Mont.affirmed
Speer v. ColbertPeckhamnonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Mead v. City of PortlandMcKennanonenoneOr.affirmed
Howard v. KentuckyMcKennaHarlannoneKy.affirmed
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. DeerHolmesnonenoneAla.reversed
Cincinnati et al. Company v. BayHolmesnonenoneOhioaffirmed
Ballmann v. FaginHolmesnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
United States ex rel. Hill v. American Surety Company of New YorkDaynonenoneWash. Super. Ct.reversed
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. ThompsonDaynonenone6th Cir.certification
Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company v. BohonDaynonenoneKy.affirmed
Armour Packing Company v. LacyFullernoneBrownN.C.affirmed
Hallenborg v. Cobre Grande Copper CompanyMcKennanonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.affirmed
Graham v. FolsomMcKennanonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Carter v. HawaiiHolmesnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Haw.reversed
Warner v. GraysonDaynonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyWhitenonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Carfer v. CaldwellFullernonenoneC.C.N.D.W. Va.reversed
Guss v. NelsonBrewernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Okla.affirmed
San Antonio Traction Company v. AltgeltBrownnonenoneTex. Civ. App.affirmed
Hibernia Savings and Loan Society v. City of San FranciscoBrownnonenoneCal.affirmed
Martin v. TexasHarlannonenoneTex. Crim. App.affirmed
United States v. Detroit Timber and Lumber CompanyBrewernonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. United States IBrewernonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. United States IIBrewernonenone9th Cir.affirmed
New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce CommissionWhitenonenoneC.C.W.D. Va.affirmed
Rector v. City Deposit Bank CompanyWhitenonenoneOhioreversed
Rector v. Commercial National BankWhitenonenoneOhioreversed
First National Bank v. ConverseWhiteHarlanBrewerC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Security Mutual Life Insurance Company v. PrewittPeckhamnonenoneKy.dismissed
Travelers Insurance Company v. PrewittPeckhamnonenoneKy.dismissed
United States v. Bitter Root Development CompanyPeckhamnonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Looney v. Metropolitan Railroad CompanyMcKennanonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
United States v. New York et al. CompanyMcKennanonenoneS.D.N.Y.reversed
Missouri v. IllinoisHolmesnonenoneoriginaldismissed
Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining CompanyHolmesnonenoneUtahaffirmed
Whitney v. DresserHolmesnonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce CommissionPeckhamnonenoneC.C.S.D. Cal.reversed
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Illinois ex rel. CommissionersHarlanHolmesBrewerIll.affirmed
United States v. ClarkHolmesMcKennanone9th Cir.affirmed