List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 141


This is a list of cases reported in volume 141 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1891.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 141 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 141 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite


July 4, 1910
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seat


December 1, 1897
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly created seat


January 22, 1892
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis


October 14, 1911
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan Clifford


September 15, 1902
Samuel BlatchfordAssociate JusticeNew YorkWard Hunt


July 7, 1893
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus LamarAssociate JusticeMississippiWilliam Burnham Woods


January 23, 1893
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews


March 28, 1910
Henry Billings BrownAssociate JusticeMichiganSamuel Freeman Miller


May 28, 1906

Notable court cases

''Marshall v. Holmes''

In Marshall v. Holmes,, the Supreme Court held it unconscionable to allow a state court's decision to stand that had been based on documents later exposed as forgeries. It permitted a federal case seeking to set that verdict aside to go forward. Other courts noted shortly afterwards that the invocation of unconscionability seemed to conflict with the Court's holding 13 years earlier in United States v. Throckmorton that equitable relief could not be granted in cases of intrinsic fraud. The Court was asked later in Graver v. Faurot to reconcile the two cases, but declined. As of the early 21st century this issue remains unresolved; some state courts and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals have held that Marshall overruled Throckmorton while others have reaffirmed the latter case.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. The change resulted in an immediate reduction in the Supreme Court's workload.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
In re GarnettBradleynonenoneS.D. Ga.prohibition denied
Pullman's Palace Car Company v. PennsylvaniaGraynoneBradleyPa.affirmed
Pullman's Palace Car Company v. HaywardGraynonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Massachusetts v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyGraynonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Crutcher v. KentuckyBradleynonenoneKy.reversed
Voight v. WrightBradleynonenoneVa. Corp. Ct.reversed
Stein v. Bienville Water Supply CompanyHarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ala.affirmed
Parker v. OrmsbyHarlannonenoneC.C.D. Neb.reversed
Carpenter v. StrangeFullernonenoneTenn.reversed
Evans v. State BankFullernonenoneC.C.E.D. La.affirmed
In re MayfieldBrownnonenoneW.D. Ark.habeas corpus granted
Reynolds v. BurnsBrownnonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.dismissed
Denny v. PironiBrownnonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company v. McBrideBrewernonenoneC.C.W.D. Ark.affirmed
Briggs v. SpauldingFullernoneGrayC.C.N.D.N.Y.affirmed
McAllister v. United StatesHarlannoneFieldCt. Cl.affirmed
Wingard v. United StatesHarlannoneFieldCt. Cl.affirmed
Gorman v. HavirdBrownnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Idahodismissed
Caldwell v. TexasFullernonenoneTex. Civ. App.dismissed
United States v. GriffithFullernonenoneCt. Cl.dismissed
Schutz v. JordanBrewernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Gregory Consolidated Mining Company v. StarrBrewernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Mont.multiple
Pacific National Bank v. EatonBradleynonenoneMass.reversed
Thayer v. ButlerBradleynonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Butler v. EatonBradleynonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Tuskaloosa Northern Railway Company v. Gudeper curiamnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ala.dismissed
Williams v. Passumpsic Savings BankFullernonenoneC.C.N.D. Fla.dismissed
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. BotsfordGraynoneBrewerC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Griswold v. HazardHarlannoneBrewerC.C.D.R.I.multiple
Potter v. CouchGraynonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
In re GreenFieldnonenoneColo.mandamus denied
McNulta v. LochridgeBrownnonenoneIll.affirmed
Magowan v. New York Belting and Packing CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D.N.J.affirmed
Gage v. BaniHarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
United States v. Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway CompanyHarlannonenoneC.C.D. Kan.reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company IHarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company IIHarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company IIIHarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Hickman v. City of Ft. ScottHarlannonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
McClain v. OrtmayerBrownnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
McLean v. ClappBrewernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Kneeland v. Luce IBrewernonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Crosby Steam Gage and Valve Company v. Consolidated Safety Valve CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal CompanyBrownnonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.affirmed
American Net and Twine Company v. WorthingtonBrownnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Leadville Coal Company v. McCreeryBrewernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
Davis v. PatrickBrewernonenoneC.C.D. Neb.affirmed
Kneeland v. Luce IIBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.multiple
Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine CompanyFullernonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.affirmed
Metropolitan National Bank v. ClaggettLamarnonenoneN.Y. Sup. Ct.affirmed
Cross v. AllenLamarnonenoneC.C.D. Or.affirmed
Adams v. Bellaire Stamping CompanyFieldnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
Olcott v. HeadrickBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Tenn.affirmed
Rogers v. United StatesBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Rector v. LipscombBrewernonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.dismissed
Patent Clothing Company, Ltd. v. GloverBrewernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Fire Insurance Association, Ltd. v. WickhamBrownnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
In re Lau Ow BewFullernonenone9th Cir.certiorari granted
Marshall v. HolmesHarlannonenoneLa. Ct. App.reversed
Johnson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway CompanyBlatchfordnoneLamarC.C.E.D. Ark.multiple
Moline Plow Company v. WebbHarlannonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.reversed
Willcox and Gibbs Sewing Machine Company v. EwingHarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.reversed
Craig v. Continental Insurance CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
Thompson v. BarerHarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.affirmed
Smyth v. New Orleans Canal and Banking CompanyFieldnonenoneC.C.E.D. La.affirmed
McLish v. RoffLamarnonenoneU.S. Ct. Indian Terr.dismissed
Ferry v. King County IFullernonenoneWash.dismissed
Ferry v. King County IIFullernonenoneWash.dismissed
Myers v. Groom Shovel CompanyFullernonenoneC.C.W.D. Pa.affirmed
Henderson Bridge Company v. City of HendersonBlatchfordnonenoneKy.dismissed
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company v. RobertsLamarnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.dismissed
Singer Manufacturing Company v. WrightFieldnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ga.dismissed