Peace Conference of 1861


The Peace Conference of 1861 was a meeting of 131 leading American politicians in February 1861, at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on the eve of the American Civil War. The conference's purpose was to avoid, if possible, the secession of the eight slave states from the upper and border South that had not done so as of that date. The seven states that had already seceded did not attend.

Background

Before the 1860 election, Republicans were excitedly predicting the end of slavery even in the South. Republican President Abraham Lincoln's election in 1860 led many in the South to conclude that now was the time for their long-discussed secession. Many pro-slavery Southerners, especially in the Lower South, were convinced that the new Republican government was determined to abolish slavery where it already existed.
In much of the South, elections were held to select delegates to special conventions to consider secession from the Union. In Congress, efforts were made in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to compromise over the issues relating to slavery dividing the nation.

Four proposals to preserve the Union

First Crittenden proposal: six constitutional amendments

In December 1860, the final session of the Thirty-sixth Congress met. In the House, the Committee of Thirty-Three, with one member from each state, led by Ohio Republican Thomas Corwin, was formed to reach a compromise to preserve the Union. In the Senate, former Kentucky Whig John J. Crittenden, elected as a Unionist candidate, submitted the Crittenden Compromise, six proposed constitutional amendments and four resolutions that would guarantee the permanent existence of slavery in the slave states and that Crittenden hoped would address all the outstanding issues. Hopes were high, especially in the border states, that the lame duck Congress could reach a successful resolution before the new Republican administration took office.
Crittenden's proposals were debated by a specially selected Committee of Thirteen. The proposals provided for, among other things, an extension of the Missouri Compromise line dividing the territories to the Pacific Ocean, bringing his efforts directly in conflict with the 1860 Republican Platform and the personal views of President-elect Abraham Lincoln, who had made known his objections. The committee rejected the compromise on December 22 by a 7–6 vote. Crittenden later brought the issue to the floor of the Senate as a proposal to make his compromise subject to a national referendum. Still, the Senate rejected it on January 16 by 25–23.

Second Crittenden proposal

A modified version of the Crittenden Plan, believed to be more attractive to Republicans, was considered by an ad hoc committee of 14 congressmen from the lower North and the upper South, meeting several times between December 28 and January 4. The committee was chaired again by Crittenden and included other Southern Unionists such as Representatives John A. Gilmer of North Carolina, Robert H. Hatton of Tennessee, J. Morrison Harris of Maryland, and John T. Harris of Virginia. The House rejected a version of their work on January 7.

Constitutional amendment protecting slavery

In the House, on January 14, the Committee of Thirty-Three reported that it had reached a majority agreement on a constitutional amendment to protect slavery where it existed and the immediate admission of New Mexico Territory as a slave state. This latter proposal would result in a de facto extension of the Missouri Compromise line for all existing territories.

Proposal from Virginia to hold a peace conference

A fourth attempt came from Virginia, one of the slave states that had not yet seceded. Former President John Tyler, now a private citizen of Virginia, had been appointed as a special Virginia envoy to President James Buchanan to urge him to maintain the status quo regarding the seceded states. Later, Tyler was an elected delegate to the Virginia convention called to consider whether or not to follow the Deep South states out of the Union. Tyler thought a final collective effort should be made to preserve the Union. In a document published on January 17, 1861, he called for a convention of the six free and six slave border states to resolve the sectional split. Governor John Letcher of Virginia had already made a similar request to the state legislature. He agreed to sponsor the convention while the list of attendees to all states was expanded. Corwin agreed to hold off any final vote on his House plan pending the final actions of the peace conference.

The Peace Conference

The conference convened on February 4, 1861, at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.; all seven Deep South states had already passed ordinances of secession, were preparing to form a new government in Montgomery, Alabama, and did not attend the peace conference, not believing it would accomplish anything significant. At the same time that Tyler, selected to head the convention, was making his opening remarks in Washington, his granddaughter was ceremonially hoisting the flag for the Confederate convention in Montgomery. No delegates were sent by the Deep South states or by Arkansas, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, California, or Oregon. Fourteen free states and seven slave states were represented. Among the representatives to the conference were James A. Seddon and William Cabell Rives from Virginia, David Wilmot from Pennsylvania, Francis Granger from New York, Reverdy Johnson from Maryland, William P. Fessenden and Lot M. Morrill from Maine, James Guthrie and William O. Butler from Kentucky, David S. Reid from North Carolina, Stephen T. Logan from Illinois, Alvan Cullom from Tennessee, and Thomas Ewing and Salmon P. Chase from Ohio. Although Louisiana did not send delegates, Rep. John Edward Bouligny, the only member of the state's congressional delegation not to resign his seat, did participate in the conference.
DelegateState
Roger S. BaldwinConnecticut
Robbins BattellConnecticut
Chauncey F. ClevelandConnecticut
Charles J. McCurdyConnecticut
James T. PrattConnecticut
Amos S. TreatConnecticut
Daniel M. BatesDelaware
William CannonDelaware
John W. HoustonDelaware
Henry RidgeleyDelaware
George B. RodneyDelaware
Burton C. CookIllinois
Stephen T. LoganIllinois
John M. PalmerIllinois
Thomas J. TurnerIllinois
John WoodIllinois
E. W. H. EllisIndiana
Pleasant A. HacklemanIndiana
Godlove S. OrthIndiana
Thomas C. SlaughterIndiana
Caleb B. SmithIndiana
Samuel R. CurtisIowa
James W. GrimesIowa
James HarlanIowa
William VandeverIowa
Henry J. AdamsKansas
Martin F. ConwayKansas
J. C. StoneKansas
Thomas Ewing Jr.Kansas
Joshua F. BellKentucky
William O. ButlerKentucky
James B. ClayKentucky
James GuthrieKentucky
Charles S. MoreheadKentucky
Charles A. WickliffeKentucky
Stephen CoburnMaine
William P. FessendenMaine
Stephen C. FosterMaine
Ezra B. FrenchMaine
Lot M. MorrillMaine
Freeman H. MorseMaine
John J. PerryMaine
Daniel E. SomesMaine
Augustus W. BradfordMaryland
John CrisfieldMaryland
John F. DentMaryland
William T. GoldsboroughMaryland
Benjamin C. HowardMaryland
Reverdy JohnsonMaryland
James Dixon RomanMaryland
Charles AllenMassachusetts
George S. BoutwellMassachusetts
Theophilus P. ChandlerMassachusetts
Francis B. CrowninshieldMassachusetts
John M. ForbesMassachusetts
John Z. GoodrichMassachusetts
Richard P. WatersMassachusetts
Aylett H. BucknerMissouri
John D. CoalterMissouri
Alexander W. DoniphanMissouri
Harrison HoughMissouri
Waldo P. JohnsonMissouri
Levi ChamberlainNew Hampshire
Asa FowlerNew Hampshire
Amos TuckNew Hampshire
William C. AlexanderNew Jersey
Frederick T. FrelinghuysenNew Jersey
Charles Smith OldenNew Jersey
Rodman M. PriceNew Jersey
Joseph F. RandolphNew Jersey
Robert F. StocktonNew Jersey
Thomas J. StrykerNew Jersey
Peter D. VroomNew Jersey
Benjamin WilliamsonNew Jersey
Greene C. BronsonNew York
Erastus CorningNew York
William E. DodgeNew York
David D. FieldNew York
Addison GardinerNew York
Francis GrangerNew York
Amaziah B. JamesNew York
John A. KingNew York
William Curtis NoyesNew York
James C. SmithNew York
James S. WadsworthNew York
John E. WoolNew York
Daniel M. BarringerNorth Carolina
George DavisNorth Carolina
J. M. MoreheadNorth Carolina
David S. ReidNorth Carolina
Thomas RuffinNorth Carolina
Franklin T. BackusOhio
Salmon P. ChaseOhio
Thomas EwingOhio
William S. GroesbeckOhio
Reuben HitchcockOhio
Valentine B. HortonOhio
Christopher WolcottOhio
John C. WrightOhio
Thomas E. FranklinPennsylvania
Andrew W. LoomisPennsylvania
William McKennanPennsylvania
William M. MeredithPennsylvania
James PollockPennsylvania
Thomas WhitePennsylvania
David WilmotPennsylvania
Samuel AmesRhode Island
Samuel G. ArnoldRhode Island
George H. BrowneRhode Island
Alexander DuncanRhode Island
William W. HoppinRhode Island
Josiah M. AndersonTennessee
Robert L. CaruthersTennessee
Alvan CullomTennessee
Isaac R. HawkinsTennessee
William P. HickersonTennessee
George W. JonesTennessee
Thomas MartinTennessee
R. J. McKinneyTennessee
Samuel MilliganTennessee
William H. StephensTennessee
A. W. O. TottenTennessee
Felix K. ZollicofferTennessee
H. Henry BaxterVermont
L. E. ChittendenVermont
Hiland HallVermont
B. D. HarrisVermont
Levi UnderwoodVermont
John W. BrockenbroughVirginia
William C. RivesVirginia
James A. SeddonVirginia
George W. SummersVirginia
John TylerVirginia

Many of the delegates came in the belief that they could be successful, but many others, from both sides of the spectrum, came simply as "watchdogs" for their sectional interests. The 131 delegates included "six former cabinet members, nineteen ex-governors, fourteen former senators, fifty former representatives, twelve state supreme court justices, and one former president", and the meeting was frequently referred to derisively as the Old Gentleman's Convention.
On February 6, a committee was formed, charged with drafting a proposal for the entire convention to consider. The committee consisted of one representative from each state and was headed by James Guthrie of Kentucky. The convention met for three weeks, and its final product was a proposed seven-point constitutional amendment that differed little from the Crittenden Compromise. The key issue, slavery in the territories, was addressed simply by extending the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific Ocean, with no provision for newly acquired territory. That section passed by a 9–8 vote of the states, each with one vote.
Other features of the proposed constitutional amendment were the requirement for the acquisition of all future territories to be approved by a majority of both the slave states and the free states, a prohibition on Congress passing any legislation that would affect the status of slavery where it currently existed, a prohibition on state legislatures from passing laws that would restrict the ability of officials to apprehend and return fugitive slaves, a permanent prohibition on the foreign slave trade, and 100% compensation to any master whose fugitive slave was freed by illegal mob action or intimidation of officials required to administer the Fugitive Slave Act. Key sections of this amendment could be further amended only with the unanimous concurrence of all states.