United States recognition of the Armenian genocide
The United States has recognized the Armenian genocide. In other words, the United States has officially declared that the Ottoman Empire's campaign of deportation and massacre of Armenians during the First World War constitutes genocide. This formal recognition was passed through two congressional resolutions by both houses of the United States Congress, and by presidential announcement. The House of Representatives passed a resolution with broad support on October 29, 2019, and the Senate did the same by unanimous consent on December 12, 2019, making the recognition of the Armenian genocide part of the policy of the United States. Before 2019, there were numerous resolutions proposed in Congress to recognize the genocide, but all failed to receive sufficient support.
In 2021, President Joe Biden referred to the events as "genocide". He formally equated the genocide perpetrated against Armenians with atrocities on the scale of those committed in Nazi-occupied Europe.
Background
Timeline
Early attempts
On April 22, 1981, U.S. President Ronald Reagan referred to the violence against Armenians as a "genocide" in a statement about the Holocaust. He said, "Like the genocide of the Armenians before it... the lessons of the Holocaust must never be forgotten".2007 resolution
On October 10, 2007, the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs approved a resolution that would have recognized the Armenian genocide by a vote of 27–21. The resolution did not receive support from President George W. Bush, who said that its passage "would do great harm to our relations with a key ally in NATO and in the global war on terror." Despite presidential opposition, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that the resolution would receive a full House vote. In the days that followed, the Turkish government and lobbyists working on its behalf–including Dick Gephardt and Bob Livingston–convinced several of the resolution's co-sponsors to withdraw their support for it. On October 25, the bill was withdrawn by its supporters.On October 11, 2007, Pelosi said that the proposed U.S. House Resolution 106 would be brought to a vote because "genocide is taking place now in Darfur, it did within recent memory in Rwanda... as long as there is genocide there is need to speak out against it." However, later she was forced to backtrack from a pledge to bring the measure for a vote because of waning support for it, since many believe that "angering Turkey would hamper efforts in Iraq". A 2015 version of the resolution had 212 co-sponsors, compared to 236 co-sponsors, which it had in early 2007.
Opposition
The bill has been opposed by the Republic of Turkey, as well as the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged U.S. lawmakers to drop the resolution. She said: "I continue to believe that the passage of the... Armenian genocide resolution would severely harm our relationships with Turkey". While a candidate, U.S. President Barack Obama stated that he "stood with the Armenian American community in calling for Turkey's acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide", but his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton assured Turkey that the White House opposes the resolution. Eight former U.S. secretaries of state, both Republican and Democrat, signed a petition calling for refraining from passing this resolution.Gregory Meeks, a Democratic representative from New York in the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs, voted against the resolution, arguing that Congress should focus on the failings of U.S. history, such as slavery or the killings of Native Americans, before it starts condemning the histories of other countries. He said, "We have failed to do what we're asking other people to do... We have got to clean up our own house."
Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former U.S. national security adviser, stated in an interview to CNN:
As far as a resolution is concerned, I never realized that the House of Representatives was some sort of an academy of learning that passes judgment on historical events. History's full of terrible crimes, and there is no doubt that many Armenians were massacred in World War I. But whether the House of Representatives should be passing resolutions whether that should be classified as genocide or a huge massacre is I don't think any of its business. It has nothing to do with passing laws, how to run the United States. That's where the constitution created the House of Representatives for.
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter also stated in an interview to CNN: "I think if I was in Congress I would not vote for it."
The resolution also received negative reactions in mass media. Richmond Times-Dispatch columnist expressed his surprise that "a Congress that has historically lacked the spine or heart to tackle the nation's ugliest legacies in a meaningful way is censuring Turkey". The newspaper quotes Robert J. Miller, a professor at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Ore., who called it "unbelievable" that Congress is pointing fingers elsewhere while ignoring a U.S. history of black enslavement and the destruction and displacement of Indians.
Turkish ambassador Nabi Şensoy stated: " is the greatest accusation of all against humanity... You cannot expect any nation to accept that kind of labeling." According to the Washington Post, to defeat the initiative for the resolution, the Turkish government "is spending more than $300,000 a month on communications specialists and high-powered lobbyists, including former congressman Bob Livingston". Turkish politician Gündüz Aktan realized that even the opponents of the resolution recognized the fact of the genocide, which he found "unbearable".
Support
According to Newsweek:"The Armenian Genocide resolution is a proper test for American democracy. It will uncover priorities of the United States – good relations with Turkey or historical truth", Russian State Duma member, Konstantin Zatulin told a news conference in Yerevan on 21 October 2007.