Thamusida
Thamusida was originally a Punic river port located in the present-day towns of Kénitra and Mehdya in Morocco. Under the Roman Empire, it formed a part of the province of Mauretania Tingitana, and starting in the seventh century it was occupied as part of the Arab conquests. Archaeologically, the site has been studied in several waves, most recently between 1999 and 2006, where excavations focused mainly on Roman and Islamic occupancy and found information mostly regarding the import and local production of food and building supplies.
Name
The Punic form of Thamusida was . Because the original name intended a hard, breathy /tʰ/ sound instead of the usual English /θ/, the same name is also sometimes written Tamusida or Tamusia. It is probably identical with the Thymiateria mentioned by Pseudo-Scylax.Archaeology at Thamusida
The site of Thamusida was first occupied in the seventh century BCE by Phoenicians, then by Romans between the first and late third centuries CE, and finally by people moving with the Arab Conquests starting in the seventh century CE. Thamusida sits in modern day Sidi Ali ben Ahmed in Northwestern Morocco. Rediscovered in the late 1800s, it was excavated on three separate occasions by a French mission between 1930 and 1960. Then, between 1999 and 2006, the University of Siena and the Institut National de Sciences de l’Archéologie et du Patrimoine de Rabat conducted more in-depth excavations.Most of the archaeology at the site focuses on Roman and Islamic occupation, with archaeologists analyzing charcoal remains to understand food production, plaster wall decorations to understand the economic and artistic situations in the town, and ceramic vessels and bricks to understand architecture and trade.
Roman Occupation
Thamusida became a Roman settlement in the first century CE, existing as both a complete town, as well as barracks for Roman soldiers in that part of the Roman province of Mauretania Tingitana. After Rome withdrew from the region in the late third century CE, the town remained, although no longer as a military base. Through a variety of archaeological approaches, researchers, most prominently Elisabetta Gliozzo, an Italian archaeologist currently at the University of Florence, have been able to piece together how Thamusida functioned within the Roman Empire, specifically in regards to which resources were produced locally and which were imported from elsewhere in the Empire.Food and Wood Production
Through analysis of plant remains, specifically charcoal, researchers have determined how residents of Thamusida likely acquired their supplies and how the town’s economy functioned. By analyzing the charcoal found while excavating the site, archaeologists identified 23 different plants, with cork oaks '' making up the greatest percentage of the assemblage. These trees were likely used for both building and firewood through the entire occupation of the site, as well as by residents using their acorns to feed livestock. Given the current degraded state of the nearby Mamora forest, where the Romans were harvesting these trees, and given the extremely numerous presence of cork oak in the Roman assemblage, researchers have suggested that this might provide evidence for Roman over-exploitation of the trees, something which continues to this day in the area. Beyond cork oak, which numerous evidence suggests was harvested locally, there is also evidence of a few pine trees in the charcoal analysis, which suggests at least some importation of wood as well, since pine does not grow in the area around Thamusida.Archaeologists also analyzed the charcoal remains of fruits and seeds at the site, determining that crop plants made up most of the assemblage. Specifically, they found that out of 26 plant types identified, 14 were cultivable plants, and among those, cereals, mainly barley and wheat, made up most of the assemblage, although there were also significant numbers of legumes and a few fruit plants. Based on the charcoal remains, Barley seems to have been the main grain people consumed at Thamusida during Roman times, despite Rome’s general dislike for using barley for human consumption. To a lesser extent, they also seem to have consumed naked wheat which was especially prevalent in the military area where their comparatively privileged status might have given them access to better grain. Residents of Thamusida may have used barley so much because it is much hardier than wheat and has a shorter growing season, which made it better equipped to survive in the area. Again based on charcoal analysis, grapes and olive trees also both seem to have been grown in Thamusida, although the limited quantity of olive remains seem to suggest that there were actually very few olive trees growing there, and so people were likely mostly consuming the fruits fresh, although some oil production is probable. Because of this, the people at Thamusida probably imported most of their olive oil. Similarly, the limited number of grapes in the area were also most likely for fresh eating, with most wine being imported as well. Overall, Thamusida during Roman occupation seems to have been mostly self-sufficient, with residents consuming mostly locally grown food and using mostly local timber, while importing some staples such as oil and wine.
Plaster and Pigments
During the Roman occupation of Thamusida, painted plasters, mostly frescoes, were common, with archaeologists having found them in public, private, and religious buildings. These plasters are of varying quality and style, with some having colorful, geometric designs, some imitating marble, and others being predominantly solid colors. By analyzing thin slices of them with optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, archaeologists determined the general makeup of the plasters, allowing them to draw additional conclusions about their production and the materials Romans used to make them. For the most part, researchers found that the plaster was applied in three layers with each subsequent layer having a smaller grain size and therefore a smoother surface to receive pigment, suggesting that artisans were sieving the material they used to make the plaster itself. These layers consisted of a base layer to prepare the wall, a middle layer, and a thin top layer to which the pigments were applied, mostly in a fresco style. In addition to understanding the techniques of their creation, archaeologists’ analysis of these plasters allowed them to determine that they were made using local sands and clays, which they were able to do by comparing the mineral makeup of the plasters to the mineral makeup of the surrounding area.On these plasters, analysts identified a variety of pigments, including bright red made of cinnabar, dark red from red ochre, yellow from yellow ochre, and blue from Egyptian blue which included tin, gold, and copper, green from either celadonite or glauconite, carbon black from carbonized plant matter, and white from calcite. In an interesting illustration of change over time, red from cinnabar is present in the earlier structures at Thamusida but not the later ones, reflecting the trend across the Roman provinces of replacing cinnabar with red ochre starting in the first century CE. Cinnabar was very expensive, imported to the rest of the Roman world from Spain, and its prohibitive cost may have been part of why Romans began to shift away from it, but its presence in some of the buildings at Thamusida points towards relative affluence for at least some residents of the town. With that said, the earlier buildings at Thamusida which do have cinnabar red have it over top of a coat of red ochre, perhaps to protect the pigment from the destructive lime in the plaster, or perhaps to allow for the use of less of the expensive pigment.
Ceramics and Bricks
There is evidence for both Roman and Islamic era pottery production facilities at Thamusida. For the Roman artifacts, archaeologists used typology to date several bottles and a jug to between the Claudian and Flavian dynasties, as well as a stewpot to the mid second century CE. Then, using thermoluminescence dating, several types of microscopy, and analysis of the minerals in the artifacts, archaeologists analyzed them again, discovering dates which generally corroborated their typological assignments, although this analysis led to the discovery of some pottery pieces from the eighteenth century CE as well. Based on their mineralogical makeup, it seems that some of these ceramics were produced in Thamusida, while the rest were likely made somewhere nearby.In a study analyzing both Roman and Islamic era bricks, archaeologists collected forty bricks from Thamusida’s settlement which dated to Roman occupation. Many of the Roman era bricks they collected were stamped with makers’ marks which they were able to use in conjunction with a variety of analysis techniques to learn more about Roman presence at the site. In dividing the bricks into categories based on their mineralogical makeup, these researchers found that not only did these divisions fall mostly along production lines, but also many of the Roman bricks were made at or near Thamusida. Not all of the bricks were made locally, however, such as those stamped with C∞ which dated to the end of the first century CE, the same time as the Roman barracks were being constructed in Thamusida, and because of this fact, as well as their mineralogical makeup, were likely imported from modern day Tangier. Similarly, the bricks which read HADRIAVG, a stamp which classifies them as having been made in an imperial workshop, cannot mineralogically have been made at Thamusida. These too were likely imported from modern day Tangier, a distance which implies that the residents of Thamusida were involved in maritime trade. Meanwhile bricks stamped QAP were found both at Thamusida and in a nearby territory which would only be possible via river trade. Thus, this analysis of bricks shows that Roman residents of Thamusida were engaging in both maritime and fluvial trade, using both locally produced and imported bricks.