Microcosm–macrocosm analogy
History
Antiquity
Among ancient Greek and Hellenistic philosophers, notable proponents of the microcosm–macrocosm analogy included Anaximander, Plato, the Hippocratic authors, and the Stoics. In later periods, the analogy was especially prominent in the works of those philosophers who were heavily influenced by Platonic and Stoic thought, such as Philo of Alexandria, the authors of the early Greek Hermetica, and the Neoplatonists. The analogy was also employed in late antique and early medieval religious literature, such as in the Bundahishn, a Zoroastrian encyclopedic work, and the Avot de-Rabbi Nathan, a Jewish Rabbinical text.Middle Ages
was generally dominated by Aristotle, who - despite having been the first to coin the term "microcosm" - had posited a fundamental and insurmountable difference between the region below the Moon and the region above the Moon. Nevertheless, the microcosm–macrocosm analogy was adopted by a wide variety of medieval thinkers working in different linguistic traditions: the concept of microcosm was known in Arabic as, in Hebrew as, and in Latin as microcosmus or minor mundus. The analogy was elaborated by alchemists such as those writing under the name of Jabir ibn Hayyan, by the anonymous Shi'ite philosophers known as the Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ, by Jewish theologians and philosophers such as Isaac Israeli, Saadia Gaon, Ibn Gabirol, and Judah Halevi, by Victorine monks such as Godfrey of Saint Victor, by the Andalusian mystic Ibn Arabi, by the German cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, and by numerous others.Renaissance
The revival of Hermeticism and Neoplatonism in the Renaissance, both of which had reserved a prominent place for the microcosm–macrocosm analogy, also led to a marked rise in popularity of the latter. Some of the most notable proponents of the concept in this period include Marsilio Ficino, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Francesco Patrizi, Giordano Bruno, and Tommaso Campanella. It was also central to the new medical theories propounded by the Swiss physician Paracelsus and his many followers, most notably Robert Fludd. Andreas Vesalius in his anatomy text De fabrica wrote that the human body "in many respects corresponds admirably to the universe and for that reason was called the little universe by the ancients."In Judaism
Analogies between microcosm and macrocosm are found throughout the history of Jewish philosophy. According to this analogy, there is a structural similarity between the human being and the cosmos as a whole.The view was elaborated by the Jewish philosopher Philo, who adopted it from Hellenistic philosophy. Similar ideas can also be found in early rabbinical literature. In the Middle Ages, the analogy became a prominent theme in the works of most Jewish philosophers.
Rabbinical literature
In the Avot de-Rabbi Natan, human parts are compared with parts belonging to the larger world: the hair is like a forest, the lungs like the wind, the loins like counsellors, the stomach like a mill, etc.Middle Ages
The microcosm–macrocosm analogy was a common theme among medieval Jewish philosophers, just as it was among the Arabic philosophers who were their peers. Especially influential concerning the microcosm–macrocosm analogy were the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity, an encyclopedic work written in the 10th century by an anonymous group of Shi'i Muslim philosophers. Having been brought to al-Andalus at an early date by the hadith scholar and alchemist Maslama al-Majriti of the Umayyad state of Córdoba, the Epistles were of central importance to Sephardic philosophers such as Bahya ibn Paquda, Judah Halevi, Joseph ibn Tzaddik, and Abraham ibn Ezra.Nevertheless, the analogy was already in use by earlier Jewish philosophers. In his commentary on the Sefer Yetzirah, Saadia Gaon put forward a set of analogies between the cosmos, the Tabernacle, and the human being. Saadia was followed in this by a number of later authors, such as Bahya ibn Paquda, Judah Halevi, and Abraham ibn Ezra.
Whereas the physiological application of the analogy in the rabbinical work Avot de-Rabbi Natan had still been relatively simple and crude, much more elaborate versions of this application were given by Bahya ibn Paquda and Joseph ibn Tzaddik, both of whom compared human parts with the heavenly bodies and other parts of the cosmos at large.
The analogy was linked to the ancient theme of "know thyself" by the physician and philosopher Isaac Israeli, who suggested that by knowing oneself, a human being may gain knowledge of all things. This theme of self-knowledge returned in the works of Joseph ibn Tzaddik, who added that in this way humans may come to know God himself. The macrocosm was also associated with the divine by Judah Halevi, who saw God as the spirit, soul, mind, and life that animates the universe, while according to Maimonides, the relationship between God and the universe is analogous to the relationship between the intellect and the human being.