Middle Indo-Aryan languages
The Middle Indo-Aryan languages are a historical group of languages of the Indo-Aryan family. They are the descendants of Old Indo-Aryan and the predecessors of the modern Indo-Aryan languages, such as Hindustani, Bengali and Punjabi.
The Middle Indo-Aryan stage is thought to have spanned more than a millennium between 600 BCE and 1000 CE, and is often divided into three major subdivisions.
- The early stage is represented by the Ardhamagadhi of the Edicts of Ashoka and Jain Agamas, and by the Pali of the Tripitakas.
- The middle stage is represented by the various literary Prakrits, especially the Shauraseni language and the Maharashtri and Magadhi Prakrits. The term Prakrit is also often applied to Middle Indo-Aryan languages. Modern scholars such as Michael C. Shapiro follow this classification by including all Middle Indo-Aryan languages under the rubric of "Prakrits", while others emphasise the independent development of these languages, often separated from Sanskrit by social and geographic differences.
- The late stage is represented by the Apabhraṃśas of the 6th century CE and later that preceded early Modern Indo-Aryan languages.
History
The Middle Indo-Aryan languages are younger than the Old Indo-Aryan languages but were contemporaneous with the use of Classical Sanskrit, an Old Indo-Aryan language used for literary purposes.
According to Thomas Oberlies, a number of morphophonological and lexical features of Middle Indo-Aryan languages show that they are not direct continuations of Vedic Sanskrit. Instead they descend from other dialects similar to, but in some ways more archaic than Vedic Sanskrit.
Early phase (3rd century BCE)
- Ashokan Prakrits
- Gandhari
- Pali
- Early Ardhamagadhi
- Elu
Middle phase (200 BCE to 700 CE)
- Monumental Prakrit
- Niya Prakrit
- Ardhamagadhi
- Dramatic Prakrits
- *Magadhi
- *Maharashtri
- *Shauraseni
- Sinhalese Prakrit
- Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit
Late phase: [Apabhraṃśa] (700–1500)
- Abahatta
General characteristics
- The replacement of vocalic liquids ṛ and ḷ by a, i or u
- The OIA diphthongs ai and au became the monophthongs e and o which were long in open syllables and short in closed syllables.
- Long vowels become short in overweight and later pre/post-tonic heavy syllables.
- The three sibilants of OIA are reduced to one, either ś or s.
- OIA clusters either became geminates through assimilation or were split by vowel epenthesis.
- Initially, intervocalic aspirated stops spirantised. Later, all other intervocalic stops were deleted, weakened, or voiced.
- Dentals are palatalised if directly preceding /j/.
- Most final consonants delete except in sandhi junctions. Final m became ṃ instead, which was preserved.
The following morphological changes distinguish typical MIA languages from their OIA ancestors:
- The dual number in nominal declensions was lost.
- Consonantal stems were thematicised.
- The i-/u- and ī-/ū- declensions were merged into one ī-/ū- declension.
- The dative was eliminated and the genitive took on its former functions.
- Many different case-endings could be used for one verbal paradigm.
- The middle voice eventually disappeared.
- mahyaṃ and tuhyaṃ became used for genitives and me and te for instrumentals.
- New verbal forms based on the present stem coexisted with fossilised forms from OIA.
- Active endings replaced passive endings for the passive voice.
The innovation is based on Sanskrit atmanepadi and parasmaipadi verbs. For example, पका दे 'give cook' has the result of the action going to someone else, and पका ले 'take cook' to the one who is doing the cooking.