Composite image filter
A composite image filter is an electronic filter consisting of multiple image filter sections of two or more different types.
The image method of filter design determines the properties of filter sections by calculating the properties they would have in an infinite chain of identical sections. In this, the analysis parallels transmission line theory on which it is based. Filters designed by this method are called image parameter filters, or just image filters. An important parameter of image filters is their image impedance, the impedance of an infinite chain of identical sections.
The basic sections are arranged into a ladder network of several sections, the number of sections required is mostly determined by the amount of stopband rejection required. In its simplest form, the filter can consist entirely of identical sections. However, it is more usual to use a composite filter of two or three different types of section to improve different parameters best addressed by a particular type. The most frequent parameters considered are stopband rejection, steepness of the filter skirt and impedance matching to the filter terminations.
Image filters are linear filters and are invariably also passive in implementation.
History
The image method of designing filters originated at AT&T, who were interested in developing filtering that could be used with the multiplexing of many telephone channels on to a single cable. The researchers involved in this work and their contributions are briefly listed below;- John Carson provided the mathematical underpinning to the theory. He invented single-sideband modulation for the purpose of multiplexing telephone channels. It was the need to recover these signals that gave rise to the need for advanced filtering techniques. He also pioneered the use of operational calculus to analyse these signals.
- George Campbell worked on filtering from 1910 onwards and invented the constant k filter. This can be seen as a continuation of his work on loading coils on transmission lines, a concept invented by Oliver Heaviside. Heaviside, incidentally, also invented the operational calculus that Carson used.
- Otto Zobel provided a theoretical basis for Campbell's filters. In 1920 he invented the m-derived filter. Zobel also published composite designs incorporating both constant and -derived sections.
- R. S. Hoyt also contributed.
The image method
The requirement for better matching to the end impedances is one of the main motivations for using composite filters. A section designed to give good matching is used at the ends but something else is designed for the body of the filter.
Filter section types
Each filter section type has particular advantages and disadvantages and each has the capability to improve particular filter parameters. The sections described below are the prototype filters for low-pass sections. These prototypes may be scaled and transformed to the desired frequency bandform.The smallest unit of an image filter is an L half-section. Because the L section is not symmetrical, it has different image impedances on each side. These are denoted and The T and the Π in the suffix refer to the shape of the filter section that would be formed if two half sections were to be connected back-to-back. T and Π are the smallest symmetrical sections that can be constructed, as shown in diagrams in the topology chart. Where the section in question has an image impedance different from the general case a further suffix is added identifying the section type, for instance
Constant section
The constant or -type filter section is the basic image filter section. It is also the simplest circuit topology. The -type has moderately fast transition from the passband to the stopband and moderately good stopband rejection.-derived section
The -derived or -type filter section is a development of the -type section. The most prominent feature of the -type is a pole of attenuation just past the cut-off frequency inside the stopband. The parameter adjusts the position of this pole of attenuation. Smaller values of put the pole closer to the cut-off frequency. Larger values of put it further away. In the limit, as approaches, the pole approaches of infinity and the section approaches a -type section.The -type has a particularly fast cut-off, going from fully pass at the cut-off frequency to fully stop at the pole frequency. The cut-off can be made faster by moving the pole nearer to the cut-off frequency. This filter has the fastest cut-off of any filter design; note that the fast transition is achieved with just a single section, there is no need for multiple sections. The drawback with m-type sections is that they have poor stopband rejection past the pole of attenuation.
There is a particularly useful property of -type filters with =0.6 . These have maximally flat image impedance in the passband. They are therefore good for matching in to the filter terminations, in the passband at least, the stopband is another story.
There are two variants of the -type section, series and shunt. They have identical transfer functions but their image impedances are different. The shunt half-section has an image impedance which matches on one side but has a different impedance, on the other. The series half-section matches on one side and has on the other.
-type section
The -type section has two independent parameters that the designer can adjust. It is arrived at by double application of the -derivation process. Its chief advantage is that it rather better at matching in to resistive end terminations than the -type or -type. The image impedance of a half-section is on one side and a different impedance, on the other. Like the -type, this section can be constructed as a series or shunt section and the image impedances will come in T and Π variants. Either a series construction is applied to a shunt -type or a shunt construction is applied to a series -type. The advantages of the -type filter are achieved at the expense of greater circuit complexity so it would normally only be used where it is needed for impedance matching purposes and not in the body of the filter.The transfer function of an -type is the same as an -type with set to the product. To choose values of and for best impedance match requires the designer to choose two frequencies at which the match is to be exact, at other frequencies there will be some deviation. There is thus some leeway in the choice, but Zobel suggests the values =0.7230 and =0.4134 which give a deviation of the impedance of less than 2% over the useful part of the band. Since =0.3, this section will also have a much faster cut-off than an -type of =0.6 which is an alternative for impedance matching.
It is possible to continue the -derivation process repeatedly and produce -types and so on. However, the improvements obtained diminish at each iteration and are not usually worth the increase in complexity.