Banker's right to combine accounts
Under English law, a bank has a general right to combine accounts where a customer has multiple accounts with the same bank. The right has been recognised since at least 1860. However it was not until the 1975 House of Lords decision in National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies Ltd AC 785 that it was finally determined that this was a type of set-off right rather than anything related to the banker's lien. Typically the right will be exercised where one account is overdrawn and the other is in credit so that the bank can secure full repayment of overdraft without the need to take any further action with respect to the customer. The broad rationale is that separate numbered accounts are set up for administrative convenience only, but the legal duty upon a bank to "account" to its customers for the sums held by it only extends to the net sum.
Mutuality
In order for the bank to combine accounts there must be mutuality, i.e. it must be the same customer and the same legal entity for the bank. However, accounts held at different branches of the same bank may still be combined. Although it has not been finally determined by case law, most commentators accept that accounts in different currencies may be combined, as may accounts in different countries.Bars to combining accounts
There are various grounds set out in the case law which indicate when an account may not be combined.- Agreement to forbear: An agreement by the bank not to combine accounts will be binding, possible even in the absence of any consideration. If not an express time, then it will generally be implied that a material change in circumstances would terminate such an agreement. Most of the authorities relating to this are older cases, but the rule was applied more recently in Fraser v Oystertec plc 1 BCLC 491.