Bioarchaeology
Bioarchaeology in Europe describes the study of biological remains from archaeological sites. In the United States it is the scientific study of human remains from archaeological sites.
The term was minted by British archaeologist Grahame Clark who, in 1972, defined it as the study of animal and human bones from archaeological sites. Jane Buikstra came up with the current US definition in 1977. Human remains can inform about health, lifestyle, diet, mortality and physique of the past. Although Clark used it to describe just human remains and animal remains, increasingly archaeologists include botanical remains.
Bioarchaeology was largely born from the practices of New Archaeology, which developed in the United States in the 1970s as a reaction to a mainly cultural-historical approach to understanding the past. Proponents of New Archaeology advocate testing hypotheses about the interaction between culture and biology, or a biocultural approach. Some archaeologists advocate a more holistic approach that incorporates critical theory.
Paleodemography
Paleodemography studies demographic characteristics of past populations. Bioarchaeologists use paleodemography to create life tables, a type of cohort analysis, to understand zdemographic characteristics of a given age cohort within a population. It is often necessary to estimate the age and sex of individuals based on specific morphological characteristics of the skeleton.Age
Age estimation attempts to determine the skeletal/biological age-at-death. The primary assumption is that an individual's skeletal age is closely associated with their chronological age. Age estimation can be based on patterns of growth and development or degenerative changes in the skeleton. A variety of skeletal series methods to assess these types of changes have been developed. For instance, in children age is typically estimated by assessing dental development, ossification and fusion of specific skeletal elements, or long bone length. For children, different teeth erupt from the gums serially are the most reliable for telling a child's age. However, fully developed teeth are less indicative. In adults, degenerative changes to the pubic symphysis, the auricular surface of the ilium, the sternal end of the 4th rib, and dental attrition are commonly used to estimate skeletal age.Until the age of about 30, human bones keep growing. Different bones fuse at different points of growth. This development can vary across individuals. Wear and tear on bones further complicates age estimates. Often, estimates are limited to 'young', 'middle', or 'old'.
Sex
are used by bioarchaeologists to determine the biological sex of human skeletons. Humans are sexually dimorphic, although overlap in body shape and sexual characteristics is possible. Not all skeletons can be assigned a sex, and some may be wrongly identified. Biological males and biological females differ most in the skull and pelvis; bioarchaeologists focus on these body parts, although other body parts can be used. The female pelvis is generally broader than the male pelvis, and the angle between the two inferior pubic rami is wider and more U-shaped, while the sub-pubic angle of the male is more V-shaped and less than 90 degrees.In general, the male skeleton is more robust than the female skeleton because of male's greater muscles mass. Male skeletons generally have more pronounced brow ridges, nuchal crests, and mastoid processes. Skeletal size and robustness are influenced by nutrition and activity levels. Pelvic and cranial features are considered to be more reliable indicators of biological sex. Sexing skeletons of young people who have not completed puberty is more difficult and problematic, because the body has not fully developed.
Bioarchaeological sexing of skeletons is not error-proof. Recording errors and re-arranging of human remains may play a part in such misidentification.
Direct testing of bioarchaeological methods for sexing skeletons by comparing gendered names on coffin plates from the crypt at Christ Church, Spitalfields, London to the associated remains achieved a 98 percent success rate.
Gendered work patterns may leave marks on bones and be identifiable in the archaeological record. One study found extremely arthritic big toes, a collapse of the last dorsal vertebrae, and muscular arms and legs among female skeletons at Abu Hureyra, interpreting this as indicative of gendered work patterns. Such skeletal changes could have resulted from women spending long periods kneeling while grinding grain with the toes curled forward. Investigation of gender from mortuary remains is of growing interest to archaeologists.
Modern sex determination methods
Recent developments in bioarchaeological methods have introduced more accurate and standardized techniques for sex estimation, especially when skeletal preservation is poor. Metric analyses of pelvic morphology using tools such as the Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste method have achieved over 95% accuracy in adult individuals when analyzing the os coxae, using discriminant functions based on population-specific reference data. Geometric morphometric analyses of cranial and pelvic landmarks, particularly when paired with statistical classifiers or machine learning algorithms, have also shown high success rates in identifying sex across both forensic and archaeological samples. Molecular techniques have also become integrated into bioarchaeological practice. Ancient DNA shotgun sequencing enables near-perfect sex determination by quantifying X- and Y-chromosome reads, proving especially valuable when osteological indicators are absent or ambiguous. Where DNA preservation is insufficient, dental proteomics as detecting amelogenin peptides in tooth enamel provides a minimally destructive and highly reliable alternative for sex estimation.Non-specific stress indicators
Dental non-specific stress indicators
Dental non-specific stress indicators are features found on teeth that reflect episodes of physiological stress experienced during childhood, particularly during the period of enamel formation. They are described as "non-specific" because, while they signal that a stress event occurred, they do not identify the exact cause, such as whether it resulted from malnutrition, illness, or infection.Enamel forms through a process called amelogenesis, carried out by specialized cells known as ameloblasts, which produce enamel in sequential layers. When these cells are affected by systemic stress, the enamel formation process can be interrupted or altered, resulting in visible developmental defects.
Enamel hypoplasia
refers to transverse furrows or pits that form in the enamel surface of teeth when the normal process of tooth growth stops, leaving a deficit. Enamel hypoplasias generally form due to disease and/or poor nutrition. Linear furrows are commonly referred to as linear enamel hypoplasias ; LEHs can range in size from microscopic to visible to the naked eye. By examining the spacing of perikymata grooves, the duration of the stressor can be estimated, although Mays argued that the width of the hypoplasia bears only an indirect relationship to the duration of the stressor.Studies of dental enamel hypoplasia are used to study child health. Unlike bone, teeth are not remodeled, so intact enamel can provide a more reliable indicator of past health events. Dental hypoplasias provide an indicator of health status during the time in childhood when the enamel of the tooth crown is forming. The presence, frequency, and severity of enamel hypoplasia offer valuable information about general health conditions and the occurrence of disease or malnutrition. Elevated rates of EH are often interpreted as evidence of widespread physiological stress, such as famine, infectious disease outbreaks, or prolonged nutritional deficiencies. By comparing the prevalence of dental stress indicators across various groups such as different social classes, geographic regions, or time periods bioarcheologists can also infer disparities in living conditions, access to resources, and overall health.
Not all enamel layers are visible on the tooth surface because enamel layers that are formed early in crown development are buried by later layers. Hypoplasias on this part of the tooth do not show on the tooth surface. Because of this buried enamel, teeth record stressors form a few months after the start of the event. The proportion of enamel crown formation time represented by this buried enamel varies from up to 50 percent in molars to 15-20 percent in anterior teeth. Surface hypoplasias record stressors occur from about one to seven years, or up to 13 years if the third molar is included.
Skeletal non-specific stress indicators
Porotic hyperostosis/cribra orbitalia
It was long assumed that iron deficiency anemia has marked effects on the flat bones of the cranium of infants and young children. That as the body attempts to compensate for low iron levels by increasing red blood cell production in the young, sieve-like lesions develop in the cranial vaults and/or the orbits. This bone is spongy and soft.It is however, unlikely that iron deficiency anemia is a cause of either porotic hyperostosis or cribra orbitalia. These are more likely the result of vascular activity in these areas and are unlikely to be pathological. The development of cribra orbitalia and porotic hyperostosis could also be attributed to other causes besides a dietary iron deficiency, such as nutrients lost to intestinal parasites. However, dietary deficiencies are the most probable cause.
Anemia incidence may be a result of inequalities within society, and/or indicative of different work patterns and activities among different groups within society. A study of iron-deficiency among early Mongolian nomads showed that although overall rates of cribra orbitalia declined from 28.7 percent during the Bronze and Iron Ages, to 15.5 percent during the Hunnu period, the rate of females with cribra orbitalia remained roughly the same, while incidence among males and children declined. This study hypothesized that adults may have lower rates of cribra orbitalia than juveniles because lesions either heal with age or lead to death. Higher rates of cribia orbitalia among females may indicate lesser health status, or greater survival of young females with cribia orbitalia into adulthood.