Suda
The Suda or Souda is a large 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia of the ancient Mediterranean world, formerly attributed to an author called Soudas or Souidas. It is an encyclopedic lexicon, written in Greek, with 30,000 entries, many drawing from ancient sources that have since been lost, and often derived from medieval Christian compilers.
Title
The exact spelling of the title is disputed. The transmitted title is "Suida", which is also attested in Eustathius' commentary on Homer's epic poems; several conjectures have been made, both defending it and trying to correct it in "Suda".- Paul Maas advocated for the Σοῦδα spelling, connecting it to the Latin verb, the second-person singular imperative of, "to sweat".
- Franz Dölger also defended Σοῦδα, tracing its origins back to Byzantine military lexicon.
- Henri Grégoire, starting from a critique to Dölger's interpretation, defended a proposal advanced by one of his pupils, and explained the word Σοῦδα as the acrostic of Συναγογὴ ὀνομάτων ὑπὸ διαφόρων ἀνδρῶν σοφῶν, "Collection of names by different learned men", or alternatively Συναγογὴ ὀνομαστικῆς ὕλης δι’ ἀλφαβήτου, "Collection of lexicographical material in alphabetical order". This suggestion was also supported by French Hellenist and Byzantinist Alphonse Dain.
- Silvio Giuseppe Mercati wrote on the matter twice: firstly in an article appeared in the academic journal Byzantion, and later in an expanded version of the same. He suggested a link with the Neo-Latin substantive , transliterated in Greek as γουίδα and later miswritten as σουίδα. This interpretation was strongly criticized by Dölger, who also refused to publish Mercati's first article in the Byzantinische Zeitschrift; on the other hand, Giuseppe Schirò supported it.
- Bertrand Hemmerdinger interpreted Σουΐδας as a Doric genitive.
Content and sources
The Suda is somewhere between a grammatical dictionary and an encyclopedia in the modern sense. It explains the source, derivation, and meaning of words according to the philology of its period, using such earlier authorities as Harpocration and Helladios. It is a rich source of ancient and Byzantine history and life, although not every article is of equal quality, and it is an "uncritical" compilation.Much of the work is probably interpolated, and passages that refer to Michael Psellos are deemed interpolations which were added in later copies.
Biographical notices
This lexicon contains numerous biographical notices on political, ecclesiastical, and literary figures of the Byzantine Empire to the tenth century, those biographical entries being condensations from the works of Hesychius of Miletus, as the author himself avers. Other sources were the encyclopedia of Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus for the figures in ancient history, excerpts of John of Antioch for Roman history, the chronicle of Hamartolus for the Byzantine age, the biographies of Diogenes Laërtius, and the works of Athenaeus and Philostratus. Other principal sources include a lexicon by "Eudemus," perhaps derived from the work On Rhetorical Language by Eudemus of Argos.Lost scholia
The lexicon copiously draws from scholia to the classics, and for later writers, Polybius, Josephus, the Chronicon Paschale, George Syncellus, George Hamartolus, and so on. The Suda quotes or paraphrases these sources at length. Since many of the originals are lost, the Suda serves as an invaluable repository of literary history, and this preservation of the "literary history" is more vital than the lexicographical compilation itself, by some estimation.Organization
The lexicon is arranged alphabetically with some slight deviations from common vowel order and place in the Greek alphabet according to a system called antistoichia ; namely the letters follow phonetically in order of sound according the pronunciation of the tenth century, which was similar to that of Modern Greek. The order is:In addition, double letters are treated as single for the purposes of collation. The system is not difficult to learn and remember, but some editors—for example, Immanuel Bekker—rearranged the Suda alphabetically.
Background
Little is known about the compiler of the Suda. He probably lived in the second half of the 10th century, because the death of emperor John I Tzimiskes and his succession by Basil II and Constantine VIII are mentioned in the entry under "Adam", which has a brief chronology of the world appended. At any rate, the work must have appeared by the 12th century, since it is frequently quoted from and alluded to by Eustathius who lived from about 1115 to about 1195–1196. It has also been stated that the work was a collective work, thus not having had a single author, and that the name which it is known under does not refer to a specific person.The work deals with biblical as well as pagan subjects, from which it is inferred that the writer was a Christian. In any case, it lacks definite guidelines besides some minor interest in religious matters.
The standard printed edition was compiled by Danish classical scholar Ada Adler in the first half of the twentieth century. A modern collaborative English translation, the Suda On Line, was completed on 21 July 2014.
The Suda has a near-contemporaneous Islamic parallel, the Kitab al-Fihrist of Ibn al-Nadim. Compare also the Latin Speculum Maius, authored in the 13th century by Vincent of Beauvais.
Editions
- : , , .
- : , , .
- Reprinted 1967–71, Stuttgart.