Murder of Muriel McKay
Muriel Freda McKay was an Australian woman who was kidnapped on 29 December 1969 in the United Kingdom and presumed murdered in the first few days of 1970. She was married to Alick McKay, an executive at News Limited and deputy to media proprietor Rupert Murdoch. McKay was kidnapped after being mistaken for Murdoch's then-wife, Anna Murdoch. Two Indo-Trinidadian brothers, Arthur and Nizamodeen Hosein, were convicted of her murder and kidnapping in September 1970.
The case was one of the earliest examples in the United Kingdom of a trial and conviction secured for a murder without a body.
Disappearance
Muriel McKay and her husband Alick were both born and raised in Adelaide, South Australia. After moving to London in 1958 for her husband's job as a newspaper executive for Rupert Murdoch's News Limited, they lived in St Mary's House on Arthur Road in Wimbledon. Their three adult children, Jennifer, Dianne and Ian, also lived in the United Kingdom.On 29 December 1969, assailants broke into the McKay home and abducted Muriel while her husband was at work. Returning home at 7:45 pm and finding the front door unlocked, the telephone ripped from the wall, the contents of his wife's handbag scattered on the stairs and the house empty, Alick reported her missing at 8pm. The attack was especially troubling given that jewellery had been stolen in a burglary incident three months earlier, and Muriel had become increasingly careful of her personal safety.
Investigation
When police arrived, the burglary case was quickly upgraded to a kidnapping after investigators found items that were foreign to the house: Elastoplast, twine, a newspaper and a billhook. After the phone was repaired at 1 am, a caller identifying himself as 'M3' contacted the house and demanded a £1 million ransom. Over the next forty days, M3 made eighteen more calls, demanding to speak to either Alick or their children Ian and Dianne, and sent three letters demanding the money while repeatedly threatening to kill Muriel. Five letters written by Muriel and pleading for compliance were enclosed as 'proof' that she was alive, as were three pieces cut from her clothing.Two successive attempts to deliver half of the ransom money were unsuccessful. The first, on the A10 road on 1 February 1970, was abandoned due to a large police presence in the area.
For the second attempt on 6 February 1970, the kidnappers specifically asked for Dianne to make the drop off, as she was always at the forefront of communication with the McKay family. However, following M3's detailed instructions, two disguised police officers placed the ransom consisting of two lots of £500,000 in two suitcases and left them at a telephone box in Church Street in Tottenham, where they would receive further instructions. At 4:00pm, M3 rang and instructed to take the ransom money to a second phone box in Bethnal Green. There, M3 rang again and instructed the officers to take the London Underground to Epping, where they were to take the money to yet another phone box. Upon their arrival at the phone box in Epping, M3 rang and instructed the officers to take a taxi to a used car yard with a garage in Bishop's Stortford where they were instructed to leave the cases next to a minivan that would be parked there on the garage forecourt.
The police conducted surveillance in the area and noticed that a blue Volvo saloon with a broken tail-light, bearing registration XGO 994G and carrying a single occupant, slowly passed the garage four times between 8 pm and 10.30pm. At 10.47 pm it passed again, this time carrying two men. However, a local couple noticed the suitcases and became concerned. The woman kept watching while her husband reported the cases to the local police, who were unaware of the drop-off and took them to Epping police station.
The investigation soon shifted to the Volvo, registered in the name of a man from Rooks Farm near Stocking Pelham, Hertfordshire. Reviewing previous reports, police noted that some witnesses had also described seeing a dark-coloured Volvo saloon driving near Arthur Road in the hours before Muriel's disappearance, and another reporting it as parked in the McKay driveway around 6pm. Police also noted the Volvo acting suspiciously at the first drop-off attempt but had assumed it was either undercover police or a local.
Rooks Farm, which covered and was considerably run down, was raided by police on 7 February at 8 am. The owners of the farm were Trinidad-born Arthur Hosein and his German-born wife Elsa. Their two children and Arthur's youngest sibling, Nizamodeen, a labourer at the farm since August, also lived at the farm. A notebook was found with torn pages that matched the tear patterns in Muriel's letters. Further, twine and a matching roll of tape were found, and the billhook was revealed as belonging to a neighbour. The brothers' physical descriptions matched those of the men seen in the Volvo, and Arthur's fingerprints matched those found on the ransom letters and a newspaper found in the McKay house. Similarly, Nizamodeen's voice matched that of recordings of M3 when he was tested on a telephone. However, no trace of Muriel was found at the farm, even after it was searched for several weeks.
Trial
Based on the evidence, the Hosein brothers were arrested and sent to trial on 14 September 1970, with the prosecution led by Peter Rawlinson. At trial it was learned that Arthur, a tailor in Hackney, was experiencing financial difficulty after buying Rooks Farm in May 1968. The Hoseins decided to kidnap Anna Murdoch after watching her husband being interviewed on television about his recent purchase of the News of the World and The Sun newspapers on 3 October 1969. However, confusion arose when the Hoseins followed Murdoch's chauffeured Rolls-Royce to the house in Arthur Road, which they assumed to be the Murdoch family residence, but it was actually the residence of the McKays. Unbeknownst to the brothers, Murdoch had loaned the car to Alick for a few weeks while he and his wife were in Australia.Throughout the case, each brother tried to put the blame on the other, although it was soon determined that Arthur was the dominant sibling. The Hoseins were charged with murder, kidnap and blackmail, and convicted at the Old Bailey on 6 October 1970. When imposing life sentences on the pair, plus twenty-five years in Arthur's case and fifteen in Nizamodeen's, the trial judge, Mr Justice Shaw, said their "conduct was cold-blooded and abominable". Despite investigation, it was never established what happened to Muriel's remains, though there was speculation that the brothers had fed them to their guard dogs or pigs.
Aftermath
The Hosein brothers were sent to prison where they attempted to appeal their sentence in March 1971. In November 1987 and September 1994, Arthur unsuccessfully applied for parole. Arthur died in Ashworth Secure Hospital in 2009, whereas Nizamodeen served twenty years and was deported to Trinidad after his release.The nature of the case led to widespread media coverage, along with numerous hoaxes, prank letters and phone calls to the McKay home. Psychic Gerard Croiset, who had participated in a number of famous missing person investigations, also became involved, although the accuracy of his information has been grossly exaggerated. Because of the notoriety of the case, likenesses of the Hosein brothers were displayed in the Chamber of Horrors in Madame Tussauds, alongside those of murderers Donald Neilson and Graham Young.
In 2017, Kelvin MacKenzie's review of Ink, a play about the history of The Sun, described the portion of the play about McKay's kidnapping as its "most dramatic moment". Jane Martinson, in her review for The Guardian, described that portion of the play as its "most uncomfortable moment".
Searches for McKay's body
An initial search for McKay was made at Rooks Farm after the arrest of the Hosein brothers in February 1970, but was hampered by the ground being hardened in the cold weather and ultimately found no trace of her.In 2021, it was reported that Nizamodeen had told a QC that Muriel died of a heart attack shortly after the kidnapping and provided details of the location of her body at Rooks Farm, which in the intervening years had been renamed to Stocking Farm. Although he denied any knowledge of the kidnapping in the Sky News documentary The Wimbledon Kidnapping, this ultimately led to a second search in 2022. Upon that search being unsuccessful, Nizamodeen began claiming that the police had dug in the wrong area, a view that later came to be shared by Muriel's family. In November 2023, Nizamodeen asked to be allowed back to the UK to show where he had buried Muriel. Nizamodeen signed a £40,000 settlement with the McKay family to reveal where Muriel was buried but later turned down the money and freely told the family how and where Muriel had died. In December 2023, Muriel's daughter Dianne urged the Metropolitan Police to cooperate with Nizamodeen to ensure the recovery of her mother's body.
In January 2024, the Home Office refused to allow Nizamodeen to return to Britain and identify the spot where he buried Muriel. Dianne McKay and her son Mark Dyer then flew to Trinidad on 27 January with The Times and Sky News to interview Nizamodeen over the course of two days. They claimed that Nizamodeen had disclosed exactly where Muriel was buried and had asked to come to Britain to show where. On 29 January, Detective Superintendent Katherine Goodwin of Scotland Yard made telephone contact with Dianne and agreed for the latter to give her recordings of a meeting with Nizamodeen. In March 2024, Goodwin told the family that investigators were due to interview Nizamodeen in Trinidad with a view to using the interview as a reason for the Home Office to let him into Britain for the purposes of the search. The interview took three days, with Goodwin texting the McKay family afterwards to tell them that Nizamodeen was "unable to provide a location with any consistency". Dianne McKay said that the family felt "completely let down by the police" and had previously told them that "if they went heavy handed, insisting on interviewing him in a police station with a male officer, it would go badly". It was also revealed that the family had asked the police not to send the senior investigating officer to Trinidad following a failed videolink interview at the time of the 2022 search; during that earlier interview, Nizamodeen became unresponsive before collapsing and requiring hospital treatment. The officer had also had a complaint filed against him by the family following an incident during the 2022 search where, after Dianne had been invited to the search area, the officer was alleged to have shouted at her.
Muriel's grandson Mark Dyer was contacted by Scotland Yard in May 2024 to confirm that they would search Stocking Farm within six weeks. In June 2024, Dyer met with Detective Superintendent Goodwin at the farm with a view to agreeing the search area. The search started on 15 July 2024 with the Metropolitan Police allowing themselves a search period of between a week and ten days. The area to be searched was three times the size of the original search area. On 22 July, it was announced that the search had been unsuccessful and no remains had been recovered. Muriel's family was not satisfied that the search had been conducted properly and insisted that Nizamodeen should have been brought to the farm to pinpoint her location; the police said that Nizamodeen had been inconsistent in his evidence and had incorrectly recalled certain events of the case.
In October 2024, Mark Dyer said that he was willing to buy Stocking Farm for over £1,000,000 if it meant that he and the rest of Muriel's family could carry out their own search of the ground. Nizamodeen's lawyer said that his client remained willing to assist with any future searches. In November 2024, Ian McKay flew to Trinidad in order to talk with Nizamodeen after the latter had specifically asked for a conversation with him; Nizamodeen again indicated where he believed Muriel was buried. Around this time, Ian also began claiming that there were areas of Stocking Farm which had not been searched by police despite them having agreed to do so.
On 14 November 2024, Katherine Goodwin met with the McKay family. During the course of this meeting, the family requested copies of the official sign offs and professional reports in respect of the searches carried out 2022 and 2024. To date, nothing has been provided.
In June 2025, the McKay family publicly offered the original £1 million ransom as a final effort to recover Muriel McKay's remains. The reward will be granted to any member of the public who provides credible evidence leading directly to the recovery of Muriel McKay's remains. The offer is subject to strict terms and conditions, which are outlined on the family's official website. The family has explicitly stated that the reward will not be paid if any illegal activity is involved in obtaining or providing the information.
In the summer of 2025, following the announcement of a £1 million reward, three new leads came to light in the case. One such lead came from the children of a man who claimed to have previously employed Arthur Hosein at his East London tailor's shop. According to the siblings, their father disclosed the information to them, giving permission for them to share it following his death. They provided the family with this information, some of which was not previously made public. This information included a description of a grey Hillman car consistent with one allegedly mentioned by Muriel in a phone call, as well as the suggestion of a strong odour noticed beneath the shop's staircase for a brief period. As such, the siblings believe that Muriel's remains may have been moved from Stocking Farm to Bethnal Green. The McKay family has since attempted to contact the current leaseholders and freeholder of the property, who have declined access.
On 10 November 2025, Chief Master Schuman formally declared Muriel dead at the High Court in London—56 years after her abduction. Until this declaration, her family were advised that they had no legal standing to pursue action against the leaseholders of Bethnal Green Road. The court has now confirmed her official time and date of death as 11:59 pm on 31 December 1969. Limited letters of administration were also granted, allowing the McKay family to proceed with legal action against the leaseholders.
The McKay family subsequently filed an application for an injunction against the leaseholders of the Bethnal Green Road property, with the matter being heard by Mr Justice Richard Smith on 24 November 2025, in the High Court in London. Mr Justice Smith handed down his judgment the following day, denying the injunction, and suggesting that the family deployed unlawful tactics of deception and harassment in their attempts to 'bully' their way into the property. The family have indicated a reluctance to give up on their search, claiming no wrongdoing and that their behaviour has been "exaggerated", despite the judge's findings to the contrary.
In December 2025, Muriel McKay's family renewed their public criticism of the Metropolitan Police, accusing the force of having obstructed and frustrated efforts to establish the location of her remains. Her son, Ian McKay alleged that the police had actively blocked the pursuit of leads with alleged historical connections to the kidnappers, particularly the one relating to Bethnal Green. The family stated that the police response had effectively closed off viable lines of enquiry, prolonging their decades-long search for answers and highlighting their ongoing frustration with what they described as a lack of meaningful institutional support. The police maintain that they've assessed the lead, and do not believe it to meet evidential threshold for further investigation, with the family's proposed means of investigation being deemed improper by both the police and the judge.