Lead abatement
Lead abatement includes lead-based paint abatement activities, such as inspections, risk assessments, as well as removal. Lead abatement must be performed by educated, certified professionals with proper safety protocols to limit lead exposure. The goal is to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards, such as serious permanent and irreversible health damage due to lead poisoning in children. This is especially important in home environments and in any facility with frequent visitation by children, particularly those built before 1978.
Techniques
Residential
There are various lead abatement techniques to remove residential lead-based paint and lead in household dusts. Encapsulation and enclosure makes the hazard of lead-based paint inaccessible, while chemical stripping, removal of abrasives, scraping with the hand, and component replacement are effective in permanently removing lead-based paints from households. Encapsulation refers to the technique that coats all lead-contaminated surfaces with a special liquid coating, which provides a long-lasting and effective barrier and prevents lead dust particles from being released. Enclosure refers to covering all lead-contaminated surfaces and objects with a solid, dust-tight barrier, which is effective in not exposing children to harmful lead paint but is not a permanent solution. Removal is the act of scraping, stripping, vacuuming, and blasting lead-based paint from contaminated surfaces. Replacement is the simple removal and substitution of only objects contaminated with lead, such as lead-painted doors and windows. However, residential lead abatement practices are relatively expensive, and some practices are ineffective and could even worsen the current situation.Soils
Lead contaminated soil is one of the leading sources of lead poisoning for children in the United States. Soils with lead are especially prominent in urban landscapes and near old homes and child-occupied facilities that were built before 1978. Lead can get into soils via deposits from leaded gasoline, degradation of leaded paint on nearby paint surfaces, exterior lead-based paint chippings and dust, and industrial sites. It is important that lead contaminated soils be properly disposed as soon as possible. For risk assessment, it is recommended by the US EPA that more than two dust and soil samples are taken. Remediation technologies and methods for lead contaminated soils include excavation and off-site disposal to permanently remove the contaminated soils from the site, containment technologies to reduce human health exposure and hazards, and traditional techniques. In addition, it is important that there is a comprehensive nationwide understanding by the people of the hazards and proper removal of lead contaminated soils. Specific, official guidelines for removal or covering of lead-contaminated soil can be found in the US EPA guidance issues in 1994, also known as the Section 403 Guidance.Lead abatement vs. RRP
Lead abatement and RRP activities are similar in that they are both performed in target housing and child-occupied facilities. In the United States, they are both protected under OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 and required to post signage in lead-related work areas.However, even though the activities performed look similar, lead abatement and RRP activities are also very different. Lead abatement is a specialized activity that is performed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards and is usually done based on orders from state or local governments after a serious lead-related incident. Meanwhile, RRP activities are only performed at the discretion and desire of the home or facility owner to temporarily minimize lead-related hazards for aesthetic or lead-unrelated purposes. Lead abatement techniques include encapsulation, enclosure, removal, and/or replacement, while RRP activities include modification or repair of painted doors, surface restoration, window repair, surface preparation that usually produces paint dust, removal of painted building components, cutting holes in painted surfaces to install insulation, and installation of interim controls that disturb existing painted surfaces. Thus, RRP activities are more high risk than lead abatement techniques because they can further disturb the existing lead paint and institute more problems.