Hesselbach Roman Fort
Hesselbach Fort was a Roman numerus fort along the older Odenwald Line of the Neckar-Odenwald Limes. This archaeological site is located in, a district of the town of Oberzent in the Odenwaldkreis, Hesse, Germany. It is the most thoroughly studied military installation of the Odenwald Limes and the southernmost Roman fort in Hesse. Hesselbach Fort serves as a reference point for nearly all other forts along the Odenwald Limes, with insights gained here applied in to interpret the entire Limes section between the rivers Main and Neckar.
Location
Hesselbach Fort is situated on the northeastern edge of Hesselbach village, on an open meadow not covered by modern buildings, near the Hessian-Bavarian border. Modern roads run along its praetorial front and flanks, while the decuman side borders a farm's courtyard and pasture. The fort's perimeter is clearly visible in the terrain.Topographically, the fort lies at 489 m above sea level on a plateau atop a ridge extending from the Mümling River's confluence near Obernburg southeast to the area around. The nutrient-poor Buntsandstein soils and harsh climate of this plateau were not ideal for settlement. However, the ridge, running parallel to the Mümling at a consistent elevation, likely made it a strategic choice for a border line. No pre-Roman finds have been recorded in the area, and Roman artefacts suggest a primarily military use, with minimal, if any, short-lived civilian activity after the fort's abandonment.
Research History and Significance
Kastell Hesselbach was first briefly mentioned in 1768 by Christian Ernst Hansselmann. A more detailed account followed half a century later by Johann Friedrich Knapp, who studied the Odenwald Limes for Count Franz I. of Erbach-Erbach. The Hessian Limes Commission likely conducted only superficial surveys, questioning whether the site was a fort due to limited evidence of solid masonry. In 1895, the Imperial Limes Commission, led by Friedrich Kofler, excavated the site, publishing results in 1896.In 1961, provincial Roman archaeologist Dietwulf Baatz studied Roman gate structures at the Tripolitanian, applying his observations to reconstruct Hesselbach’s gate buildings. Baatz later led extensive excavations at Hesselbach from 1966 to 1968, using advanced methods under the Saalburg Museum’s auspices. These excavations and the resulting publication were groundbreaking for Odenwald Limes research. Hesselbach is now considered the best-researched numerus fort of the Odenwald Line, particularly due to the comprehensive documentation of its internal structures, which serve as a model for reconstructing other Odenwald numerus forts.
Archaeological Evidence
While the Reichs-Limeskommission’s late 19th-century excavations focused on the fort’s perimeter, the 1960s excavations prioritised the interior. Both campaigns identified multiple construction phases. Due to the lack of a clear stratigraphic link between perimeter and internal phases, distinct designations were used. However, correlations between these phases are supported by finds and their distribution.| Perimeter | Interior | from | to |
| Perimeter A | Period 1 | trajanic | 115–130 |
| Perimeter B | Period 2 | 115–130 | around 145 |
| Perimeter C | Period 2a | around 145 | 148–161 |
| Partially destroyed perimeter C | Period 3 | 148–161 | 165 at the latest |
Fort Perimeter
The fort’s perimeter enclosed approximately 0.6 hectares and remained consistent in shape across all phases, with successive walls built nearly atop one another. The Porta praetoria faced the Limes, approximately 150 metres east. The Porta principalis dextra had the widest passage, suggesting it was the primary entrance. The perimeter’s contours are visible in the unbuilt meadow, with modern paths encircling the fort. An information board stands at the northern end.Perimeter A
Constructed during the Trajanic period, Perimeter A was built in timber and soil with a wooden palisade stabilised by an earth rampart and timber posts on the inside, which supported a simple walkway. A fossa Punica with a steeper outer slope lay beyond a narrow berm. The fort had three gates: the Porta praetoria, Porta principalis dextra, and Porta principalis sinistra, each flanked by wooden towers supported by six posts. No Porta decumana, postern gate, or corner towers were identified.Perimeter B
During the Hadrianic period, Perimeter B replaced the palisade with a double dry stone wall, measuring 5.0 m to 6.9 m in width. It consisted of outer and inner shells of unhewn Buntsandstein, filled with earth and timber, supporting, facing the Limes, a walkway possibly paved with planks and a breastwork. The fossa Punica continued but had silted up. The wooden gate structures remained unchanged, with three gates and a drainage channel for a latrine in the retentura, where no Porta decumana was identified at this stage.Perimeter C
Between 140 and 150 CE, Perimeter C introduced a mortared wall built mostly in front of Perimeter B’s outer face, with an earth rampart behind. The foundation, 80 cm deep, was 1.0–1.2 m wide, with a 95 cm thick wall of Buntsandstein bonded with lime mortar from nearby Muschelkalk. The inner face used small stones, the outer larger blocks, likely topped with merlons. White plaster with red false joints is assumed but not preserved. It was probably completely eroded in the acidic soil of Hesselbach, but can be assumed with a fair degree of certainty to be analogous to other forts and watchtowers.A new ditch, 6 m wide and 1.5 m deep, replaced the silted one, separated by a 60–80 cm berm. The gates were rebuilt, adding a 1.25 m wide rear postern gate. The three main gates had twin towers, likely with covered gatehouses. The Porta principalis dextra passage was 3.4 m, the others 3 m. The postern gate, possibly with a wooden bridge, was secured with a bar and was 1.25 m wide. No corner towers existed, but rounded corners featured risalti. This peculiarity of the wall construction, which cannot really be explained, can also be found at the.
Internal Structures
The fort’s internal buildings included the , four barracks with contubernia, the praetorium, and storage and stable facilities. The principia indicates an independent numerus unit of about 160 men. The praetentura housed stables and stores, the principia occupied the centre, and the retentura contained the praetorium and barracks. All structures were wooden, identified by postholes and trenches.Period 1
The principia, including its portico, covered approximately little less than 200 square metres. Entry was via a 4.2–4.4 × 10.7 m portico opening to the via praetoria. It led to a courtyard flanked by porticoes, a basilica, and a three-room block with the central aedes principiorum.The praetorium in the retentura measured 10.5 × 15.0 m, with an entrance facing the principia. It likely had six rooms and a possible latrine, with a hearth indicating heating.
Four barracks flanked the principia and praetorium, each 34.6–34.8 × 4.55 m with nine rooms. Each contubernium likely housed 4–5 soldiers, suggesting a fort strength of 130–140 men.
In the praetentura, Building 7 was a storage facility, possibly including armamentaria. Buildings 8 and 9 were likely stables, with a possible group of ovens nearby.
All buildings of period 1 were constructed in timber. No evidence of repairs or destruction could be found at any point; the buildings were apparently taken down according to plan before they fell into disrepair to make room for the construction of new buildings.
Period 2
Period 2 mirrored Period 1’s layout but used sturdier posts. The principia had a larger portico and a cistern in the basilica. The praetorium was a corridor house with three rooms per side, most with hearths.Four barracks included porticoes and officer’s quarters. Barrack 4 had seven contubernia and a 53 m² officer’s quarter. Variations existed:
| Baracks | Length | Width | Head building | Contubernia Quantity | Contubernia Size |
| 1 | 35,4 m | 6,45 m | 59 m² | 6 | 18,0 m² |
| 2 | 35,4 m | 7,20 m | 97 m² | 5 | 20,8 m² |
| 3 | 35,0 m | 5,25 m | no head | 9 | 12,5 m² |
| 4 | 34,8 m | 7,37 m | 53 m² | 7 | 19,4 m² |
Building 7 was a multi-purpose horreum and armamentaria. Buildings 8 and 9 were stables, and Building 10’s function is unclear. Streets were gravel, and wastewater was managed via a main drain.
Period 2a (Repair Phase)
Period 2a involved repairs, including post replacements and hearth relocations, with the principia’s aedes principiorum rear wall aligned.Period 3 (Post-Fort Phase)
After the troops advanced to the so-called "Vordere Limes", Period 3 saw civilian ironworking using a bloomery. The operation was short-lived due to low ore yields.Finds
Coins
Four identifiable coins were found, too few for precise dating:| Unit | Representation | Coining | Place of coining | RIC | Finding place | Year of find | Remarks |
| Denarius | Vitellius | 69 | Rome | 224 No. 2 | Period 2 post trench | 1965 | |
| As or Dupondius | Domitian | 81–96 | Rome | within "Building 4" | 1966 | fully corroded | |
| Denarius | Trajan | 114–117 | Rome | 337 | from a well outside the fort | 1902 | |
| Dupondius | Hadrian | 119–121 | Rome | 601 | 1895 |