Central Solomon languages
The Central Solomon languages are the four Papuan languages spoken in the state of Solomon Islands.
The four languages are, listed from northwest to southeast,
- Bilua of Vella Lavella and Ghizo islands,
- Touo '' of Rendova Island,
- Lavukaleve of the Russell Islands, and
- Savosavo of Savo Island.
Classification
Pedrós suggests, tentatively, that the branching of the family is as follows.
;Central Solomons
- Lavukaleve–Touo
- Savosavo–Bilua
Palmer regards the evidence for Central Solomons as tentative but promising.
An automated computational analysis by Müller et al. grouped Touo, Savosavo, and Bilua together. Lavukaleve was not included. However, since the analysis was automatically generated, the grouping could be either due to mutual lexical borrowing or genetic inheritance.
Pronoun reconstructions
Pedrós argues for the existence of the family through comparison of pronouns and other gender, person and number morphemes and based on the existence of a common syncretism between 2nd person nonsingular and inclusive. He performs an internal reconstruction for the pronominal morphemes of each language and then proposes a reconstruction of some of the pronouns of the claimed family. The reconstructions are the following:| 1 singular | 2 singular | inclusive/ 2 non-singular | 1 exclusive | |
| Pre-Savosavo | *a-ɲi | *no | *me | a- |
| Pre-Touo | e̤ | noe | *me | e̤- |
| Pre-Lavukaleve | *ŋai | *ŋo | *me | e |
| Pre-Bilua | *ani/*aŋai | *ŋo | me | e- |
| Proto-Central Solomons | *ani/*aŋai | *ŋo | *me | *e |
Numerals
Central Solomon numerals from Pedrós :As the comparisons indicate, lexical evidence for the relatedness of the four languages is limited.
Vocabulary comparison
The following basic vocabulary words are from Tryon & Hackman, as cited in the Trans-New Guinea database. The Savosavo data is from Claudia Wegener's field notes.The words cited constitute translation equivalents, with no claim as to whether they are cognate or not. If one sets apart the obvious loanwords from Oceanic languages, the number of potential cognates across these four varieties is evidently very low.