Benefit corporation
In business, particularly in United States corporate law, a benefit corporation is a type of for-profit corporate entity whose goals include making a positive impact on society. Laws concerning conventional corporations typically do not define the "best interest of society", which has led to the belief that increasing shareholder value is the only overarching or compelling interest of a corporation. Benefit corporations explicitly specify that profit is not their only goal. An ordinary corporation may change to a benefit corporation merely by stating in its approved corporate bylaws that it is a benefit corporation.
A company chooses to become a benefit corporation in order to operate as a traditional for-profit business while simultaneously addressing social, economic, and/or environmental needs. For example, a 2013 study done by MBA students at the University of Maryland showed that one main reason businesses in Maryland had chosen to file as benefit corporations was for community recognition of their values. A benefit corporation's directors and officers operate the business with the same authority and behavior as in a traditional corporation, but are required to consider the impact of their decisions not only on shareholders but also on employees, customers, the community, and the local and global environment. For an example of what additional impacts directors and officers are required to consider, view the Maryland Code § 5-6C-07 – Duties of director. The nature of the business conducted by the corporation does not affect its status as a benefit corporation. Instead, it provides a justification for including public benefits in their missions and activities.
The benefit corporation legislation ensures that a director is required to consider other public benefits in addition to profit, preventing shareholders from using a drop in stock value as evidence for dismissal or a lawsuit against the corporation. Transparency provisions require benefit corporations to publish annual benefit reports of their social and environmental performance using a comprehensive, credible, independent, and transparent third-party standard. However, few of the states have included provisions for the removal of benefit corporation status or fines if the companies fail to publish benefit reports that comply with the state statutes.
Although approximately 36 jurisdictions now authorize the creation of benefit corporations, outside of those jurisdictions there are no legal standards that define what constitutes a benefit corporation. With jurisdictions that recognize this form of business, a benefit corporation is intended "to merge the traditional for-profit business corporation model with a non-profit model by allowing social entrepreneurs to consider interests beyond those of maximizing shareholder wealth." In jurisdictions where regulations have not been enacted, a benefit corporation need not be certified or audited by the third-party standard. Instead, it may use third-party standards solely as a rubric to measure its own performance.
Some research suggests a possible synergy between a benefit corporation and employee ownership.
History
United States
In April 2010, Maryland became the first U.S. state to pass benefit corporation legislation., 36 states and Washington, D.C., have passed legislation allowing for the creation of benefit corporations: and enhance corporate responsibility.| State | Date passed | Date in effect | Legislation |
| Alabama | December 31, 2020 | January 1, 2021 | |
| Arizona | April 30, 2013 | December 31, 2014 | |
| Arkansas | April 19, 2013 | July 18, 2013 | |
| California | October 9, 2011 | January 1, 2012 | |
| Colorado | May 15, 2013 | April 1, 2014 | |
| Connecticut | April 24, 2014 | October 1, 2014 | , |
| Delaware | July 17, 2013 | August 1, 2013 | |
| Georgia | July 29, 2020 | January 1, 2021 | |
| Florida | June 20, 2014 | July 1, 2014 | , |
| Hawaii | July 8, 2011 | July 8, 2011 | |
| Idaho | April 2, 2015 | July 1, 2015 | |
| Illinois | August 2, 2012 | January 1, 2013 | |
| Indiana | April 30, 2015 | July 1, 2015 | |
| Iowa | June 8, 2021 | June 8, 2021 | |
| Kansas | March 30, 2017 | July 1, 2017 | |
| Kentucky | March 7, 2017 | July 1, 2017 | |
| Louisiana | May 31, 2012 | August 1, 2012 | |
| Maine | Jun 17, 2019 | Jun 17, 2019 | |
| Maryland | April 13, 2010 | October 1, 2010 | |
| Massachusetts | August 7, 2012 | December 1, 2012 | |
| Minnesota | April 29, 2014 | January 1, 2015 | , |
| Montana | April 27, 2015 | October 1, 2015 | |
| Nebraska | April 2, 2014 | July 18, 2014 | |
| Nevada | May 24, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | |
| New Hampshire | July 11, 2014 | January 1, 2015 | |
| New Jersey | January 10, 2011 | March 1, 2011 | |
| New Mexico | February 18, 2020 | February 18, 2020 | , |
| New York | December 12, 2011 | February 10, 2012 | |
| Ohio | December 18, 2020 | March 24, 2021 | |
| Oklahoma | April 15, 2019 | November 1, 2019 | |
| Oregon | June 18, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | |
| Pennsylvania | October 12, 2012 | January 1, 2013 | |
| Rhode Island | July 17, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | |
| South Carolina | June 6, 2012 | June 14, 2012 | |
| Tennessee | May 20, 2015 | January 1, 2016 | |
| Texas | June 14, 2017 | September 1, 2017 | |
| Utah | April 1, 2014 | May 13, 2014 | |
| Vermont | May 19, 2010 | July 1, 2011 | |
| Virginia | March 26, 2011 | July 1, 2011 | |
| Washington, D.C. | February 8, 2013 | May 1, 2013 | |
| West Virginia | March 31, 2014 | July 1, 2014 | |
| Wisconsin | November 27, 2017 | February 26, 2018 |
Connecticut's benefit corporation law is the first to allow "preservation clauses", which allow the corporation's founders to prevent it from reverting to a 'For Profit' entity at the will of their shareholders.
Public benefit LLCs
A subset of benefit corporation, the public benefit LLC, allows for limited liability companies the same opportunities afforded to corporations under a state's benefit corporation law.| State | Date passed | Date in effect | Legislation | |
| Delaware | July 23, 2018 | August 1, 2018 | , 149th Gen. Assem. | |
| Kansas | April 18, 2019 | July 1, 2019 | ||
| Maryland | May 19, 2011 | June 1, 2011 | , | |
| Oregon | June 18, 2013 | January 1, 2014 | ||
| Pennsylvania | November 21, 2016 | February 19, 2017 | ||
| Utah | March 19, 2018 | March 19, 2018 |
Similar bills have been introduced in Connecticut and Illinois.
Social purpose corporations
Some states have passed legislation for creating social purpose corporations, which are more flexible in their legal requirements and responsibilities compared to benefit corporations.| State | Date passed | Date in effect | Legislation |
| California | October 9, 2011 | January 1, 2012 | and for FPCs; revised and renamed as SPCs in 2015 via |
| Florida | June 20, 2014 | July 1, 2014 | , |
| Washington | March 30, 2012 | June 7, 2012 |
Low-profit limited liability companies
Low-profit limited liability companies were created to comply with the Internal Revenue Service program-related investments rules ) which allow most typically private foundations the ability to maintain tax-exempt status through investments in qualifying businesses and/or charities. They blend aspects of law regarding limited liability companies with aspects of non-profit law, but remain for-profit companies for tax purposes.| State | Date passed | Date in effect | Legislation |
| Illinois | August 4, 2009 | January 1, 2010 | |
| Louisiana | June 21, 2011 | June 21, 2011 | |
| Maine | June 8, 2009 | June 8, 2009 | |
| Michigan | January 15, 2009 | January 15, 2009 | |
| Rhode Island | June 8, 2011 | January 1, 2012 | |
| Utah | April 1, 2013 | May 14, 2013 | |
| Vermont | April 30, 2008 | April 30, 2008 | |
| Wyoming | February 26, 2009 | July 1, 2009 |