Australian Securities and Investments Commission
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission is an independent commission of the Australian Government tasked as the national corporate regulator. ASIC's role is to regulate company and financial services and enforce laws to protect Australian consumers, investors and creditors. ASIC, which reports to the treasurer, was established on 1 July 1998 following recommendations from the Wallis Inquiry.
Areas of responsibility
ASIC's authority and scope are determined by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001.ASIC's areas of responsibility include:
- corporate governance
- financial services
- securities and derivatives
- insurance
- consumer protection
- financial literacy
ASIC is responsible for the administering the following legislation:
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
- Business Names Registration Act 2011
- Corporations Act 2001
- Insurance Contracts Act 1984
- National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009
- Banking Act 1959
- Life Insurance Act 1995
- Medical Indemnity Act 2003
- Retirement Savings Accounts Act 1997
- Superannuation Act 1993
- Superannuation Industry Act 1993.
Registers
History
ASIC was originally formed as the Australian Securities Commission, established on 1 January 1991 by the ASC Act 1989. The purpose of ASC was to unify corporate regulators around Australia by replacing the National Companies and Securities Commission and the Corporate Affairs offices of the states and territories.The corporate regulator became the Australian Securities and Investments Commission on 1 July 1998, when it also became responsible for consumer protection in superannuation, insurance and deposit taking. It has since gained further responsibilities: in 2002 for credit, the Australian Stock Exchange in 2009, and Chi-X in 2011.
Criticisms
In 2012, ASIC called for powers to use data which had been intercepted by other intelligence agencies.In recent times ASIC has become the subject of criticism by consumers, consumer advocates and public officials over its inaction and inefficiencies in protecting consumers from large financial institutions.
In 2015–2016 ASIC was subject to a class action claim of negligence by persons affected by the Storm Financial collapse for an alleged failure to take action, amounting to malfeasance. However, Justice Gleeson of the Federal Court of Australia struck out the statement of claim of the plaintiffs as being unarguable.
ASIC has not acted against the Financial Ombudsman Service despite the organisation being exposed as having generated misleading file notes and then attempting to offer them in the discovery phase in a Victorian Supreme Court case. FOS were caught out and exposed by a consumer and ASIC has not acted against FOS.
ASIC did commence proceedings against the largest four banks in Australia in 2016 for rigging of Australian benchmark interest rates. However criticism has been leveled against the regulator for failing to take action for over five years. Questions remain about how this will affect consumer civil causes of action against banks involved, given that the statute of limitations tends to be six years in Australia.
In 2016, ASIC became the subject of heavy criticism in the debate concerning the creation of a Royal Commission into banking and financial services.