List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 146


This is a list of cases reported in volume 146 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1892.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 146 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article Three of [the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1] of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 146 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite


July 4, 1910
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seat


December 1, 1897
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis


October 14, 1911
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan Clifford


September 15, 1902
Samuel BlatchfordAssociate JusticeNew YorkWard Hunt


July 7, 1893
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus LamarAssociate JusticeMississippiWilliam Burnham Woods


January 23, 1893
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews


March 28, 1910
Henry Billings BrownAssociate JusticeMichiganSamuel Freeman Miller


May 28, 1906
George Shiras Jr.Associate JusticePennsylvaniaJoseph P. Bradley


February 23, 1903

Notable Case in 146 U.S.

''McPherson v. Blacker''

McPherson v. Blacker,, concerned a law passed in Michigan which divided the state into separate congressional districts and awarded one of the state's electoral votes to the winner of each district. The suit was filed by several of these electors chosen in the 1892 election, including William McPherson, against Robert R. Blacker, the Secretary of State of Michigan. It was the first Supreme Court case to consider whether certain methods of states' appointments of their electors were constitutional. The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Chief Justice Melville Fuller, upheld Michigan's law, and more generally gave state legislatures plenary power over how they appointed their electors.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 146 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
McPherson v. BlackerFullernonenoneMich.affirmed
Van Winkle v. CrowellBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.M.D. Ala.affirmed
Cincinnati Safe and Lock Company v. Grand Rapids Safety Deposit CompanyFullernonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohiodismissed
Hubbard v. SobyFullernonenoneC.C.D. Conn.dismissed
Earnshaw v. United StatesBrownnonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.affirmed
United States v. PerryBrownnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
United States v. SchoverlingBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Cross v. BurkeFullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissed
Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater and Lake Michigan Railroad CompanyBrownnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
Ware v. Galveston City CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Tex.affirmed
City of Bellaire v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyGraynonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioreversed
San Pedro and Canyon del Agua Company v. United StatesBrewernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. N.M.affirmed
Mattox v. United StatesFullernonenoneD. Kan.reversed
Roby v. ColehourHarlannonenoneIll.affirmed
Morley v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway CompanyShirasnoneHarlanN.Y.affirmed
Hardee v. WilsonShirasnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ga.dismissed
Cook v. HartBrownnonenoneC.C.E.D. Wis.affirmed
Stotesbury v. United StatesBrewernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. DentonGraynonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.reversed
Root v. Third Avenue Railway CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Washington and Georgetown Railroad Company v. District of ColumbiaFullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissed
Junge v. HeddenFullernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Thompson v. St. Nicholas National BankBlatchfordnonenoneN.Y.affirmed
Toplitz v. HeddenBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Hamilton Gaslight and Coke Company v. City of HamiltonHarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
In Re CrossFullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.habeas corpus denied
Wilmington and Weldon Railroad Company v. AlsbrookFullernonenoneN.C.affirmed
Butler v. GoreleyBlatchfordnonenoneMass. Super. Ct.affirmed
Hallinger v. DavisShirasnonenoneC.C.D.N.J.affirmed
Benson v. United StatesBrewernonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
United States v. DunningtonBrownnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. OsborneFullernonenone8th Cir.certiorari denied
Joy v. Adelbert CollegeFullernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohiodismissed
In re EnglesFullernonenoneE.D.N.Y.prohibition denied
McMullen v. United StatesHarlannonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Balloch v. HooperHarlannonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Lewis v. United StatesShirasnoneBrewerC.C.W.D. Ark.reversed
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. IllinoisFieldnoneShirasC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed as modified
Derby v. ThompsonBrownnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Compania Bilbaina de Navegacion de Bilbao v. Spanish-American Light and Power CompanyBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Scott v. ArmstrongFullernonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioreversed
Mitchell v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad CompanyFullernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Brinkerhoff v. AloeFullernonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
National Tube Works Company v. VallouBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Royer v. CoupeBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Cameron v. United StatesBrownnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.dismissed
McGourkey v. Toledo and Ohio Central Railway CompanyBrownnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
United States v. Southern Pacific Railroad CompanyBrewernoneFieldC.C.S.D. Cal.reversed
United States v. Colton Marble and Lime CompanyBrewernoneFieldC.C.S.D. Cal.reversed
Brown v. Marion National BankFullernonenoneKy.dismissed
Means v. Bank of RandallBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Lloyd v. PrestonShirasnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line CommissionersFullernonenoneWash.dismissed
Huntington v. AttrillGraynoneFullerMd.reversed
Potts v. WallaceShirasnonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.reversed