Natural logarithm
The natural logarithm of a number is its logarithm to the base of the mathematical constant, which is an irrational and transcendental number approximately equal to. The natural logarithm of is generally written as,, or sometimes, if the base is implicit, simply. Parentheses are sometimes added for clarity, giving,, or. This is done particularly when the argument to the logarithm is not a single symbol, so as to prevent ambiguity.
The natural logarithm of is the power to which would have to be raised to equal. For example, is, because. The natural logarithm of itself,, is, because, while the natural logarithm of is, since.
The natural logarithm can be defined for any positive real number as the area under the curve from to . The simplicity of this definition, which is matched in many other formulas involving the natural logarithm, leads to the term "natural". The definition of the natural logarithm can then be extended to give logarithm values for negative numbers and for all non-zero complex numbers, although this leads to a multi-valued function: see complex logarithm for more.
The natural logarithm function, if considered as a real-valued function of a positive real variable, is the inverse function of the exponential function, leading to the identities:
Like all logarithms, the natural logarithm maps multiplication of positive numbers into addition:
Logarithms can be defined for any positive base other than 1, not only. However, logarithms in other bases differ only by a constant multiplier from the natural logarithm, and can be defined in terms of the latter,.
Logarithms are useful for solving equations in which the unknown appears as the exponent of some other quantity. For example, logarithms are used to solve for the half-life, decay constant, or unknown time in exponential decay problems. They are important in many branches of mathematics and scientific disciplines, and are used to solve problems involving compound interest.
History
The concept of the natural logarithm was worked out by Gregoire de Saint-Vincent and Alphonse Antonio de Sarasa before 1649. Their work involved quadrature of the hyperbola with equation, by determination of the area of hyperbolic sectors. Their solution generated the requisite "hyperbolic logarithm" function, which had the properties now associated with the natural logarithm.An early mention of the natural logarithm was by Nicholas Mercator in his work Logarithmotechnia, published in 1668, although the mathematics teacher John Speidell had already compiled a table of what in fact were effectively natural logarithms in 1619. It has been said that Speidell's logarithms were to the base, but this is not entirely true due to complications with the values being expressed as integers.
Notational conventions
The notations and both refer unambiguously to the natural logarithm of, and without an explicit base may also refer to the natural logarithm. This usage is common in mathematics, along with some scientific contexts as well as in many programming languages. In some other contexts such as chemistry, however, can be used to denote the common logarithm. It may also refer to the binary logarithm in the context of computer science, particularly in the context of time complexity.Generally, the notation for the logarithm to base of a number is shown as. So the of to the base would be.
Definitions
The natural logarithm can be defined in several equivalent ways.Inverse of exponential
The most general definition is as the inverse function of, so that. Because is positive and invertible for any real input, this definition of is well defined for any positive.Integral definition
The natural logarithm of a positive, real number may be defined as the area under the graph of the hyperbola with equation between and. This is the integralIf is in, then the region has negative area, and the logarithm is negative.
This function is a logarithm because it satisfies the fundamental multiplicative property of a logarithm:
This can be demonstrated by splitting the integral that defines into two parts, and then making the variable substitution in the second part, as follows:
In elementary terms, this is simply scaling by in the horizontal direction and by in the vertical direction. Area does not change under this transformation, but the region between and is reconfigured. Because the function is equal to the function, the resulting area is precisely.
The number can then be defined to be the unique real number such that.
Properties
The natural logarithm has the following mathematical properties:Derivative
How to establish this derivative of the natural logarithm depends on how it is defined firsthand. If the natural logarithm is defined as the integral
then the derivative immediately follows from the first part of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
On the other hand, if the natural logarithm is defined as the inverse of the exponential function, then the derivative can be found by using the properties of the logarithm and a definition of the exponential function.
From the definition of the number the exponential function can be defined as
where
The derivative can then be found from first principles.
Also, we have:
so, unlike its inverse function, a constant in the function doesn't alter the differential.
Series
Since the natural logarithm is undefined at 0, itself does not have a Maclaurin series, unlike many other elementary functions. Instead, one looks for Taylor expansions around other points. For example, if thenThis is the Taylor series for around 1. A change of variables yields the Mercator series:
valid for and
Leonhard Euler, disregarding, nevertheless applied this series to to show that the harmonic series equals the natural logarithm of ; that is, the logarithm of infinity. Nowadays, more formally, one can prove that the harmonic series truncated at is close to the logarithm of, when is large, with the difference converging to the Euler–Mascheroni constant.
The figure is a graph of and some of its Taylor polynomials around 0. These approximations converge to the function only in the region ; outside this region, the higher-degree Taylor polynomials devolve to worse approximations for the function.
A useful special case for positive integers, taking, is:
If then
Now, taking for positive integers, we get:
If then
Since
we arrive at
Using the substitution again for positive integers, we get:
This is, by far, the fastest converging of the series described here.
The natural logarithm can also be expressed as an infinite product:
Two examples might be:
From this identity, we can easily get that:
For example:
The natural logarithm in integration
The natural logarithm allows simple integration of functions of the form : an antiderivative of is given by. This is the case because of the chain rule and the following fact:In other words, when integrating over an interval of the real line that does not include, then
where is an arbitrary constant of integration.
Likewise, when the integral is over an interval where,
For example, consider the integral of over an interval that does not include points where is infinite:
The natural logarithm can be integrated using integration by parts:
Let:
then:
Efficient computation
For where, the closer the value of is to 1, the faster the rate of convergence of its Taylor series centered at 1. The identities associated with the logarithm can be leveraged to exploit this:Such techniques were used before calculators, by referring to numerical tables and performing manipulations such as those above.
Natural logarithm of 10
The natural logarithm of 10, approximately equal to, plays a role for example in the computation of natural logarithms of numbers represented in scientific notation, as a mantissa multiplied by a power of 10:This means that one can effectively calculate the logarithms of numbers with very large or very small magnitude using the logarithms of a relatively small set of decimals in the range.
High precision
To compute the natural logarithm with many digits of precision, the Taylor series approach is not efficient since the convergence is slow. Especially if is near 1, a good alternative is to use Halley's method or Newton's method to invert the exponential function, because the series of the exponential function converges more quickly. For finding the value of to give using Halley's method, or equivalently to give using Newton's method, the iteration simplifies towhich has cubic convergence to.
Another alternative for extremely high precision calculation is the formula
where denotes the arithmetic-geometric mean of 1 and, and
with chosen so that bits of precision is attained. In fact, if this method is used, Newton inversion of the natural logarithm may conversely be used to calculate the exponential function efficiently. Or, the following formula can be used:
where
are the Jacobi theta functions.
Based on a proposal by William Kahan and first implemented in the Hewlett-Packard HP-41C calculator in 1979, some calculators, operating systems, computer algebra systems and programming languages provide a special natural logarithm plus 1 function, alternatively named LNP1, or log1p to give more accurate results for logarithms close to zero by passing arguments, also close to zero, to a function, which returns the value, instead of passing a value close to 1 to a function returning. The function avoids in the floating point arithmetic a near cancelling of the absolute term 1 with the second term from the Taylor expansion of the natural logarithm. This keeps the argument, the result, and intermediate steps all close to zero where they can be most accurately represented as floating-point numbers.
In addition to base, the IEEE 754-2008 standard defines similar logarithmic functions near 1 for binary and decimal logarithms: and.
Similar inverse functions named "expm1", "expm" or "exp1m" exist as well, all with the meaning of.
An identity in terms of the inverse hyperbolic tangent,
gives a high precision value for small values of on systems that do not implement.