List of statements independent of ZFC
The mathematical statements discussed below are independent of ZFC, assuming that ZFC is consistent. A statement is independent of ZFC if it can neither be proven nor disproven from the axioms of ZFC.
[Axiomatic set theory]
In 1931, Kurt Gödel proved the first ZFC independence result, namely that the consistency of ZFC itself was independent of ZFC.The following statements are independent of ZFC, among others:
- the consistency of ZFC;
- the continuum hypothesis or CH ;
- the generalized continuum hypothesis ;
- a related independent statement is that if a set x has fewer elements than y, then x also has fewer subsets than y. In particular, this statement fails when the cardinalities of the power sets of x and y coincide;
- the axiom of constructibility ;
- the diamond principle ;
- Martin's axiom ;
- MA + ¬CH.
and :
Several statements related to the existence of large cardinals cannot be proven in ZFC. These are independent of ZFC provided that they are consistent with ZFC, which most working set theorists believe to be the case. These statements are strong enough to imply the consistency of ZFC. This has the consequence that their consistency with ZFC cannot be proven in ZFC. The following statements belong to this class:
- Existence of inaccessible cardinals
- Existence of Mahlo cardinals
- Existence of measurable cardinals
- Existence of supercompact cardinals
- Proper forcing axiom
- Open coloring axiom
- Martin's maximum
- Existence of 0#
- Singular cardinals hypothesis
- Projective determinacy
[Set theory of the real line]
A subset X of the real line is a strong measure zero set if to every sequence of positive reals there exists a sequence of intervals which covers X and such that In has length at most εn. Borel's conjecture, that every strong measure zero set is countable, is independent of ZFC.
A subset X of the real line is -dense if every open interval contains -many elements of X. Whether all -dense sets are order-isomorphic is independent of ZFC.
[Order theory]
asks whether a specific short list of properties characterizes the ordered set of real numbers R. This is undecidable in ZFC. A Suslin line is an ordered set which satisfies this specific list of properties but is not order-isomorphic to R. The diamond principle ◊ proves the existence of a Suslin line, while MA + ¬CH implies EATS, which in turn implies the nonexistence of Suslin lines. Ronald Jensen proved that CH does not imply the existence of a Suslin line.Existence of Kurepa trees is independent of ZFC, assuming consistency of an inaccessible cardinal.
Existence of a partition of the ordinal number into two colors with no monochromatic uncountable sequentially closed subset is independent of ZFC, ZFC + CH, and ZFC + ¬CH, assuming consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. This theorem of Shelah answers a question of H. Friedman.
[Abstract algebra]
In 1973, Saharon Shelah showed that the Whitehead problem is independent of ZFC. An abelian group with Ext1 = 0 is called a Whitehead group; MA + ¬CH proves the existence of a non-free Whitehead group, while V = L proves that all Whitehead groups are free.In one of the earliest applications of proper forcing, Shelah constructed a model of ZFC + CH in which there is a non-free Whitehead group.
Consider the ring A = R of polynomials in three variables over the real numbers and its field of fractions M = R. The projective dimension of M as A-module is either 2 or 3, but it is independent of ZFC whether it is equal to 2; it is equal to 2 if and only if CH holds.
A direct product of countably many fields has global dimension 2 if and only if the continuum hypothesis holds.
[Number theory]
One can write down a concrete polynomial p ∈ Z such that the statement "there are integers m1,..., m9 with p = 0" can neither be proven nor disproven in ZFC. This follows from Yuri Matiyasevich's resolution of Hilbert's tenth problem; the polynomial is constructed so that it has an integer root if and only if ZFC is inconsistent.[Measure theory]
A stronger version of Fubini's theorem for positive functions, where the function is no longer assumed to be measurable but merely that the two iterated integrals are well defined and exist, is independent of ZFC. On the one hand, CH implies that there exists a function on the unit square whose iterated integrals are not equal — the function is simply the indicator function of an ordering of equivalent to a well ordering of the cardinal ω1. A similar example can be constructed using MA. On the other hand, the consistency of the strong Fubini theorem was first shown by Friedman. It can also be deduced from a variant of Freiling's axiom of symmetry.[Topology]
The Normal Moore Space conjecture, namely that every normal Moore space is metrizable, can be disproven assuming CH or MA + ¬CH, and can be proven assuming a certain axiom which implies the existence of large cardinals. Thus, granted large cardinals, the Normal Moore Space conjecture is independent of ZFC.Various assertions about finite, P-points, Q-points,...
S- and L-spaces
[Functional analysis]
and Robert M. Solovay proved in 1976 that Kaplansky's conjecture, namely that every algebra homomorphism from the Banach algebra C into any other Banach algebra must be continuous, is independent of ZFC. CH implies that for any infinite X there exists a discontinuous homomorphism into any Banach algebra.Consider the algebra B of bounded linear operators on the infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space H. The compact operators form a two-sided ideal in B. The question of whether this ideal is the sum of two properly smaller ideals is independent of ZFC, as was proved by Andreas Blass and Saharon Shelah in 1987.
Charles Akemann and Nik Weaver showed in 2003 that the statement "there exists a counterexample to Naimark's problem which is generated by ℵ1, elements" is independent of ZFC.
Miroslav Bačák and Petr Hájek proved in 2008 that the statement "every Asplund space of density character ω1 has a renorming with the Mazur intersection property" is independent of ZFC. The result is shown using Martin's maximum axiom, while Mar Jiménez and José Pedro Moreno had presented a counterexample assuming CH.
As shown by Ilijas Farah and N. Christopher Phillips and Nik Weaver, the existence of outer automorphisms of the Calkin algebra depends on set theoretic assumptions beyond ZFC.