Gamma distribution


In probability theory and statistics,[] the gamma distribution is a versatile two-parameter family of continuous probability distributions. The exponential distribution, Erlang distribution, and chi-squared distribution are special cases of the gamma distribution. There are two equivalent parameterizations in common use:
  1. With a shape parameter and a scale parameter
  2. With a shape parameter and a rate parameter
In each of these forms, both parameters are positive real numbers.
The distribution has important applications in various fields, including econometrics, Bayesian statistics, and life testing. In econometrics, the parameterization is common for modeling waiting times, such as the time until death, where it often takes the form of an Erlang distribution for integer α values. Bayesian statisticians prefer the parameterization, utilizing the gamma distribution as a conjugate prior for several inverse scale parameters, facilitating analytical tractability in posterior distribution computations.
The gamma distribution is the maximum entropy probability distribution for a random variable for which is fixed and greater than zero, and is fixed.

Definitions

The parameterization with and appears to be more common in econometrics and other applied fields, where the gamma distribution is frequently used to model waiting times. For instance, in life testing, the waiting time until death is a random variable that is frequently modeled with a gamma distribution. See Hogg and Craig for an explicit motivation.
The parameterization with and is more common in Bayesian statistics, where the gamma distribution is used as a conjugate prior distribution for various types of inverse scale parameters, such as the of an exponential distribution or a Poisson distribution – or for that matter, the of the gamma distribution itself. The closely related inverse-gamma distribution is used as a conjugate prior for scale parameters, such as the variance of a normal distribution.
If is a positive integer, then the distribution represents an Erlang distribution; i.e., the sum of independent exponentially distributed random variables, each of which has a mean of.

Characterization using shape ''α'' and rate ''λ''

The gamma distribution can be parameterized in terms of a shape parameter and an inverse scale parameter, called a rate parameter. A random variable that is gamma-distributed with shape and rate is denoted
The corresponding probability density function in the shape-rate parameterization is
where is the gamma function.
For all positive integers,.
The cumulative distribution function is the regularized gamma function:
where is the lower incomplete gamma function.
If is a positive integer, the cumulative distribution function has the following series expansion:

Characterization using shape ''α'' and scale ''θ''

A random variable that is gamma-distributed with shape and scale is denoted by
Image:Gamma-PDF-3D.png|thumb|right|320px|Illustration of the gamma PDF for parameter values over and with set to and . One can see each layer by itself here as well as by and . .
The probability density function using the shape-scale parametrization is
Here is the gamma function evaluated at.
The cumulative distribution function is the regularized gamma function:
where is the lower incomplete gamma function.
It can also be expressed as follows, if is a positive integer :
Both parametrizations are common because either can be more convenient depending on the situation.

Properties

Mean and variance

The mean of gamma distribution is given by the product of its shape and scale parameters:
The variance is:
The square root of the inverse shape parameter gives the coefficient of variation:

Skewness

The skewness of the gamma distribution only depends on its shape parameter,, and it is equal to

Higher moments

The -th raw moment is given by:
with the rising factorial.

Median approximations and bounds

Unlike the mode and the mean, which have readily calculable formulas based on the parameters, the median does not have a closed-form equation. The median for this distribution is the value such that
A rigorous treatment of the problem of determining an asymptotic expansion and bounds for the median of the gamma distribution was handled first by Chen and Rubin, who proved that
where is the mean and is the median of the distribution. For other values of the scale parameter, the mean scales to, and the median bounds and approximations would be similarly scaled by.
K. P. Choi found the first five terms in a Laurent series asymptotic approximation of the median by comparing the median to Ramanujan's function. Berg and Pedersen found more terms:
Partial sums of these series are good approximations for high enough ; they are not plotted in the figure, which is focused on the low- region that is less well approximated.
Berg and Pedersen also proved many properties of the median, showing that it is a convex function of, and that the asymptotic behavior near is , and that for all the median is bounded by.
A closer linear upper bound, for only, was provided in 2021 by Gaunt and Merkle, relying on the Berg and Pedersen result that the slope of is everywhere less than 1:
for
which can be extended to a bound for all by taking the max with the chord shown in the figure, since the median was proved convex.
An approximation to the median that is asymptotically accurate at high and reasonable down to or a bit lower follows from the Wilson–Hilferty transformation:
which goes negative for.
In 2021, Lyon proposed several approximations of the form. He conjectured values of and for which this approximation is an asymptotically tight upper or lower bound for all. In particular, he proposed these closed-form bounds, which he proved in 2023:
is a lower bound, asymptotically tight as
is an upper bound, asymptotically tight as
Lyon also showed two other lower bounds that are not closed-form expressions, including this one involving the gamma function, based on solving the integral expression substituting 1 for :

and the tangent line at where the derivative was found to be :

where Ei is the exponential integral.
Additionally, he showed that interpolations between bounds could provide excellent approximations or tighter bounds to the median, including an approximation that is exact at and has a maximum relative error less than 0.6%. Interpolated approximations and bounds are all of the form
where is an interpolating function running monotonially from 0 at low to 1 at high, approximating an ideal, or exact, interpolator :
For the simplest interpolating function considered, a first-order rational function
the tightest lower bound has
and the tightest upper bound has
The interpolated bounds are plotted in the log–log plot shown. Even tighter bounds are available using different interpolating functions, but not usually with closed-form parameters like these.

Summation

If has a distribution for , then
provided all are independent.
For the cases where the are independent but have different scale parameters, see Mathai or Moschopoulos.
The gamma distribution exhibits infinite divisibility.

Scaling

If
then, for any,
by moment generating functions,
or equivalently, if

Indeed, we know that if is an exponential r.v. with rate, then is an exponential r.v. with rate ; the same thing is valid with Gamma variates : multiplication by a positive constant divides the rate.

Exponential family

The gamma distribution is a two-parameter exponential family with natural parameters and , and natural statistics and.
If the shape parameter is held fixed, the resulting one-parameter family of distributions is a natural exponential family.

Logarithmic expectation and variance

One can show that
or equivalently,
where is the digamma function. Likewise,
where is the trigamma function.
This can be derived using the exponential family formula for the moment generating function of the sufficient statistic, because one of the sufficient statistics of the gamma distribution is.

Information entropy

The information entropy is
In the, parameterization, the information entropy is given by

Kullback–Leibler divergence

The Kullback–Leibler divergence, of from is given by
Written using the, parameterization, the KL-divergence of from is given by

Laplace transform

The Laplace transform of the gamma PDF, which is the moment-generating function of the gamma distribution, is
.

Related distributions

General